找回密码
 立即注册
楼主: atcoolman

The Real Warren Buffett - 巴菲特每周新闻专贴

[复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-17 21:50:44 | 显示全部楼层

金融海啸一年之际,美国CNBC电视台对巴老进行采访全文:

Warren Buffett's Complete CNBC "One Year Later" Interview - Transcript
Published: Wednesday, 16 Sep 2009 | 8:40 AM ET
By: Alex Crippen


Warren Buffett's interview with Becky Quick marking the one-year anniversary of the height of the financial crisis aired in two parts on CNBC this morning and last night.

In part one, Buffett described the phone calls he got over that weekend in September, 2008, as Lehman and AIG were trying to avoid collapse. He didn't make any deals and says he has no regrets about what he did, or didn't do.

In part two, Buffett says he doesn't see a "bounce" in the economy right now, but also doesn't expect a 'double-dip' recession and thinks residential real estate is improving.

This is the transcript of the complete interview, including portions that did not air on TV in either part.

BECKY QUICK: Welcome everyone. We are here at Fortune's Most Powerful Women conference with Warren Buffet, who is one of just three men who made it into this conference. Warren, thank you very much for joining us today.

WARREN BUFFETT: That's right. Thank you.

BECKY: How'd you-- how'd you make it into the women's conference? (LAUGHTER)

BUFFETT: Nobody knows. I mean-- for a guy that couldn't get a date in high school this is Heaven, I can tell you that. (LAUGHTER)

BECKY: You know, we've been looking back at a year later. We are one year out from Lehman's and a lot of people are trying to figure out whether it was the right choice, whether it was the wrong choice. There are some people who say if Lehman didn't fail the rest of the-- the capital markets would not have survived. What do you think?

BUFFETT: Well, I think -- I think Lehman was destined to fail unless the government came in big time. And -- you know, for one reason or another the -- they generally said they didn't have the authority. My experience usually is it that whatever the government wants to do, they find the authority, but if -- if -- listen, if Merrill Lynch hadn't gotten sold on -- on -- on -- on Sunday -- what would have happened Monday would have been off the charts.

BECKY: So the ?

BUFFETT: We'll ?

BECKY: -- more important ?

BUFFETT: -- we're ?

BECKY: -- one to save?

BUFFETT: Lehman -- Lehman probably should have been -- not saved isn't the right world -- word, but transferred in some kind of an orderly manner. I mean it was -- it was the chaos that came after the fact that it just -- it just happened and there was total disorder. And I think the trustee for Lehman has said between $50 and $75 billion at Lehman itself was lost unnecessarily because of the disorderly way that the liquidation took place.

BECKY: Obviously there were a lot of calls that were going on behind the scenes at that point. Were you a part of any of those calls?

BUFFETT: Oh, I -- I got a call. I was in Edmonton -- at a social event that -- I was at the hotel about 6 o’clock or so Edmonton time. And I did get a call from -- from -- the head of -- the head of Barclay's -- Bob Diamond and -- and Michael Klein, who was an investment banker. And they had just learned apparently that the British authorities would not allow them to take over all of Lehman. This was not just the part that they took over later. But they were -- they were talking about -- about coming in and taking over Lehman. And the British authorities had said if -- if it involved more than three billion pounds, as I remember, it needed the vote of shareholders and that couldn't take place 'til sometime later so they were asking if we would write an insurance contract that would protect everybody on the other side of trades until they got that shareholder approval. So they were looking for a solution I can tell you at about 8 o’clock on ?

BECKY: On Saturday?

BUFFETT: -- on Saturday. And ? 8 o’clock in the evening. And -- they didn't find one.

BECKY: Were you surprised? I mean it -- what happened? Did you turn down this offer? What happened?

BUFFETT: Well, what happened is they described the transaction to me that I really couldn't grasp -- quickly. And so I asked them to send me a fax at the hotel. I was gonna go to the social affair that would break up around midnight. Send me a fax, that explains the transaction in detail so I could understand it. Tell me how much of a limit they needed and -- how much of a premium they would pay. And then I would get back to them promptly. I'd call 'em that night. And -- 'cause it was a complicated transaction they were describing. I didn' t -- I didn't fully understand it and people were waiting for me downstairs. (CHUCKLES) Anyway -- when I got back to the hotel that night around midnight, but there was no fax. Apparently it blew up at some point in that period.

BECKY: What -- what did you hear afterwards? That -- did they explain to you why or what?

BUFFETT: Well, I -- no, I -- I don't know why they felt the transaction was unfeasible or I don't know if for some other reason that Barclay's decided they couldn't go ahead with Lehman at that point. And as you know, a few days later they actually made a transaction with the broker-dealer arrangement. But -- the way I understood it on Saturday at 8 o’clock New York time or so was that -- that -- one of the authorities in -- in England had ruled essentially that if it involved more than, I think, three billion pounds that they couldn't do it without shareholder approval.

BECKY: Did you get other phone calls that weekend?

BUFFETT: I (LAUGHS) got a lot of phone calls. I had a phone call on Friday night -- the Friday -- late Friday afternoon -- on AIG. And they -- they were gonna need many, many billions of dollars by the following Wednesday, so I went down to the office on Friday night and looked hard at whether we might possibly buy a very large property casualty operation from them. And -- spent a few hours then. And then I called (AIG CEO) Bob Willumstad and I said, "Unfortunately -- I can't do this deal. And don't waste your time with me, so go someplace else." Then on Sunday after I got back from Edmonton, AIG was in the picture again and they were looking for an insurance policy in connection with an offer that was being made for AIG. I think it was by Chris Flowers and perhaps KKR, a few people.

BECKY: Right.

BUFFETT: A few people. And they said they were gonna get goin' to a board meeting and decide whether they were going to accept this. But if they did accept it would we be good on a certain type of reinsurance transaction. I said I thought we would. But then that blew up on Sunday night, so it was -- a lot of action.

BECKY: Is this different than any time you'd ever experienced before?

BUFFETT: It was --

BECKY: That were --

BUFFETT: -- it was -- except for the Solomon experience I had in 1991, when I was more directly involved. This was a very extraordinary weekend.

BECKY: What did you see in the AIG deal, in the offer there that you -- that you thought, "Forget about it. This is not gonna work?"

BUFFETT: I just -- we were talking about buying a property casualty operation that might have sold in the $25 billion range. And what I saw indicated to me I wouldn't have wanted to pay that in the first place. And beyond that it would have required New York State Insurance Department approval and who knows was else. And I just -- there was no way to hand a lot of money by Wednesday the next -- the next week.

BECKY: And in hindsight do you have any regrets about any of the decisions you made that weekend?

BUFFETT: No. I -- I mean the -- the -- I should have been probably doing other things too. No, I -- I'm -- I am -- I am glad we didn't buy that particular insurance operation. I would have done the reinsurance transaction that was involved on Sunday night. The Lehman thing I still don't understand, even (CHUCKLES) to this day, exactly what the transaction was. No, it was -- it was -- it was a movie to see but not to -- participate in. (LAUGHS)

BECKY: We are one year out. When-- in-- in the worst of it last year, what was-- the worst possible thing you could imagine happening that didn't happen?

BUFFETT: Well, I think if-- if the-- country and the Fed. I mean if Bernanke and Paulson and whoever else was involved with the decision, but if they hadn't have stepped up to guarantee-- in effect guarantee commercial paper and guarantee the money market funds-- the meltdown would have been immediate. I mean it-- I don't-- it-- it's hard to tell how far it would have gone. But it would have gone-- it would have gone further than anybody would have wanted to-- to see. And that-- you can argue, (LAUGHS) if Bank of America hadn't bought Merrill Lynch on Sunday, on Monday I think Merrill would have gone. I mean-- and so if you had Lehman and Merrill go in the same day-- who knows what would have happened.

BECKY: Who do you think the biggest heroes are?

BUFFETT: Well, I think the heroes are-- are?(Federal Reserve Chairman) Bernanke. I think (former Treasury Secretary) Paulson's a hero. I think (current Treasury Secretary) Geithner’s a hero are-- I-- I-- you know, you can look back and say you could have done this a little differently or that a little differently, but at the time I called it an economic Pearl Harbor and in the end we got through Pearl Harbor. And-- and it could have turned out a lot differently.

BECKY: There are some people, including (bank analyst) Meredith Whitney, who say-- we've just kicked things down the road. That the banks-- are-- are still struggling. That we have a lot of problems that could still come up from credit cards, from other areas, from consumers getting pinched for-- needing credit. Are we through the worst of it? And--

BUFFETT: Oh, I think we're certainly?we’re through the worst of it in residential real estate in all probability. And-- and-- and the reason is we're building a lot fewer houses and we're-- and we're forming households, so that solves itself over time. Doesn't do it in a day or a week, but it solves itself. So we're further on that. We're gonna have unusual losses in credit cards and in commercial real estate, all of that. But we're a lot better off than we were a year ago. I mean for one thing on some of the-- some of the toxic assets have been flushed through. There's been capital raised. There’s -- we're immeasurably better than we were-- off than we were a year ago.

BECKY: But is there a risk of a second downturn? Will unemployment levels climb to a point where it becomes a leading indicator rather than a lagging indicator?

BUFFETT: I-- I think the odds are very much against getting significantly worse. It's sort of plateaued at the-- at the bottom right now, but if you got some horrible exogenous event, some-- some, you know, 9/11-- type event or worse-- you know, you could have something that would be dis-- really disruptive and start things all over again. But in terms of problems that we've identified and are working with, we've got more to come. But we're-- we're-- we're past the-- we're past the critical point.

BECKY: What are the most important economic indicators that you watch? Is there a series of numbers? Are there-- some statistics that you look at most closely?

BUFFETT: Well, I look at our businesses every day. But I-- I look at everything. I mean I-- I-- I look at car loadings. I look at the Fed's balance sheet. Whatever it may be. I mean I-- and-- and we have not bounced-- but we've quit going down. I'm and-- and it?the world will come back. I've never been able to tell whether it's gonna be a week or a month or-- six months. But we are on the mend. And-- and if you look at-- at housing prices and activity in the mid to lower price range, it changed dramatically from a year ago. We're seeing some stability.

BECKY: All right. Let me go at this another way. Let's pretend you're on a desert island for a month. There's only one set of numbers you can get. What would it be?

BUFFETT: Well, I would probably look at-- perhaps freight car loadings and-- perhaps-- and-- and truck tonnage moved and-- but I’d want to look at a lot of figures. (LAUGHTER)

BECKY: You are the biggest shareholder-- Berkshire Hathaway is the biggest shareholder in Kraft. Is the Kraft [KFT 26.27 --- UNCH (0) ] bid to go after Cadbury [CSG 0.64 --- UNCH (0) ] a good one?

BUFFETT: Well, it's a pretty full one. I mean-- the-- Kraft-- Kraft has got-- anytime you're in a takeover, you know, that-- the animal spirits run high and all of that. But Kraft has the disadvantage of using an undervalued stock. So if you-- if part of your currency is a stock that's worth more money than it's selling for and you're-- you're paying full negotiated value for the other guy’s property and you wouldn't sell your own property for anything like the market price, it's-- it's a-- it makes it a tough game. So it's-- it's a full price.

BECKY: Are-- that makes it sound like as if you're not in favor of this bid?

BUFFETT: No, I-- I've got a lot of confidence in (Kraft CEO) Irene Rosenfeld. She'll-- but they have to do a lot of things right to justify this price.

BECKY: You know, Warren-- at the last filings released for the SEC it showed that you were selling-- some of your healthcare holdings. WellPoint, United Healthcare. Is that because you worry that the healthcare proposals out there in Washington might now affect the business?

BUFFETT: No, those are not my holdings. Those are Lou Simpson’s. I've never bought a healthcare shock that I-- any-- well, jobs-- jobs in a healthcare stock. But in terms of the-- of the-- of the insurers or providers-- those are not my holdings. I-- I've never bought a share in WellPoint or United Health.

BECKY: What do you think about the-- the talk towards health care and where things are headed right now?

BUFFETT: Well, I think that-- unfortunately, I think that the -- what-- what-- we're really talking about reforming health insurance more than health care. So I-- the incentives that produce the 16 or so percent of GDP that's going to health care, I think unfortunately they're getting-- they're going to get changed. But-- so I think that we really-- and I'm talking as much about reforming health care as we're talking about reforming the insurance. And I think that will be an opportunity missed if we don't do more about looking at what-- what the incentives are in the present system and what they would be in an ideal system.

BECKY: And then finally, if-- if you had to-- give a gauge of where you stand on the economy again right now-- versus what you were thinking three months ago, is it the same? Is it better?

BUFFETT: It-- it hasn't gotten worse. It hasn't gotten much better either. But the very fact that time is passing, it's-- it's gotten better in residential real estate. That’s important. Certain things haven't hit much yet. Commercial real estate, for example. But we are moving through a recession. And-- and-- and I see nothing that makes me worry about the fact that it's going to be worse than I would have thought three months ago.

BECKY: And, again, Warren, we want to thank you for your time for joining us today.

BUFFETT: Thank you.

Current Berkshire stock prices:

Class A: [BRK.A 103000.0 --- UNCH (0) ]

Class B: [BRK.B 3381.00 --- UNCH (0) ]

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-9-26 17:31:49 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特点金术再现神奇 大杨创世借势股价翻倍

古希腊神话中,国王迈达斯(Midas)获得了点石成金的本领,点石成金也叫做“Midas Touch”。如今,这项本领并没有失传,环顾全球证券市场,沃伦?巴菲特也拥有迈达斯的手指,并且巴菲特的这个本领在中国格外的灵验,任何股票只要跟巴菲特传出点“绯闻”,股价立刻扶摇直上。

  巴菲特最新的点金故事,与西服有关。

  巴菲特与西服的故事

  故事要追溯到2007年。当时巴菲特到大连参加伊斯卡尔金属制品公司一家新工厂的开幕仪式,这是伯克希尔?哈撒韦公司的一笔收购交易。

  有一天,巴菲特入住的酒店房间里来了两个不速之客??两位中国裁缝。他们一进到房间,就开始把量尺绕在巴菲特的大腿和腰上,仅仅8分钟后,这两位不速之客就满意地离开了。

  三个星期后,巴菲特回到美国,打开包裹发现是大杨创世(600233.SH)送来的两件定制西服。“非常合身。”股神巴菲特发出感叹。

  如今,巴菲特已经拥有了9套大杨创世的西服和一套晚礼服,另外还预订了两套西服、一套运动服和一条宽松裤。

  大杨创世董事长李桂莲也因此成了股神的座上客。今年5月份,李桂莲应巴菲特之邀,参加了伯克希尔?哈撒韦公司的股东会,并获得与巴菲特单独会面交流的机会。
李桂莲的营销能力不止如此。

  大杨创世控股股东大杨集团创建30周年前夕,应李桂莲的请求,巴菲特专门为大杨创世录制了一段3分钟的宣传视频。“我现在有9套创世的西装……我认为比尔?盖茨和我应该开一家男装店,卖李女士的西装。”巴菲特在视频中对创世服装大加赞赏,并在视频中说,他已经向伯克希尔?哈撒韦公司的商业合伙人查理?芒格以及微软创始人比尔?盖茨推荐了这一品牌。

  如今,在大杨的网站上仍能找到这段视频。而在9月19日开幕的第20届大连国际服装节入口的一块大屏幕上,这段视频更是在循环播放,每隔约3分钟,巴菲特就会说上一句“我现在的9件西装都是中国制造的,我把其余的都扔掉了”。

  巴菲特称自己会是创世服装“出色的推销员”。巴菲特这段视频能让创世服装销量增加多少很难说,但巴菲特“推销员”的角色的确出色。自从9月9日该视频公开以来,大杨创世的股价扶摇直上,从视频曝光前的9.30元,一路上冲至9月24日的最高点18.07元,涨幅接近100%,其间大盘下跌了3%。

  而直接持有大杨创世25.73万股股票,并通过持股49%的大杨集团间接持有大杨创世19.76%股份的李桂莲,其间身家更是大涨2.88亿元。

“股神效应”引发游资炒作

  巴菲特声称自己并没有拥有任何大杨创世的股票,而市场所关注的巴菲特与大杨创世的合作目前也无任何迹象。在大杨创世股票连连涨停之后,大杨创世董事会在9月16日发布公告进行澄清,称公司收到的视频仅仅是股神巴菲特的祝贺词,不涉及任何商业行为,而截至目前,巴菲特除为公司创世品牌西装客户外没有其他关联关系。但声明未能阻止大杨创世股价的强势表现。直到9月24日,大杨创世的涨停在盘中被打开,至9月25日收盘,两个交易日累计下跌了7.91%。

  一位券商分析师表示,大杨创世的此番上涨纯粹是市场对“巴菲特概念”的炒作,而且从目前看来,巴菲特也没有和大杨创世有任何合作项目。“现在股价炒到这么高,完全脱离了基本面,终究是要回归的。”该分析师还表示,目前一段时间也不会安排到大杨创世调研,因为估值太高没法向客户推荐。

  深圳一位私募基金人士也表示,大杨创世近期的表现只能解释为巴菲特在中国证券市场的号召力太强了,而近期市场的投机氛围又很浓,天时地利之下,游资找准了这个机会大肆炒作“股神概念”。
“金手指”的魔力

  尽管年逾古稀,巴菲特在证券市场的号召力的确是独一无二的。市场上只要有巴菲特即将购买或抛售某种股票的传言,股价就会马上出现异动,而巴菲特一年一度的致股东的信,也都引来全球的投资者争先拜读。

  而在中国,巴菲特“金手指”的魔力更是屡试不爽。

  2003年,巴菲特首度关注中国上市公司,并先后斥资约38亿港元买入中国石油(00857.HK)23.39亿股,平均持股成本约1.65港元。此后,中石油价格一路稳步上涨。从2007年7月开始,巴菲特在近4个月的时间里将中石油抛光。市场估计其减持价格在13~16港元之间,收益近10倍。

  2008年9月,巴菲特再将绣球抛向比亚迪(01211.HK)。由于巴菲特的入股,比亚迪一年来上涨约800%。遥望港股频频获得股神青睐,A股市场的投资者们也不甘寂寞,一系列与比亚迪沾边的题材股在当时掀起一阵炒作旋风,A股市场中同为新能源概念股的科力远和德赛电池成为一时的牛股。

  中石油、比亚迪的上涨逻辑似乎有迹可循,而全球也不乏一些专门跟踪股神做投资的投资者。但此后“股神效应”愈演愈烈,一些与巴菲特并无实质联系的股票只要与股神的名字沾上点边,也能引来一番炒作狂潮。

  大杨创世便是如此。而早在大杨创世之前,著名私募人士赵丹阳也借着巴菲特的名气,为自己重仓的物美商业(08277.HK)造势。
比起李桂莲,赵丹阳的出手更为大气,花了211万美元的天价拍得与股神共进午餐的机会。当时国内舆论纷纷认为赵丹阳这单午餐费花得“不值”。但值不值,投资者随后才纷纷顿悟。

  赵丹阳借着午餐的机会,向股神推荐了自己重仓的物美商业,一时引发港股市场的轰动。从午餐当天(6月24日)起,物美商业连续4个交易日拉出阳线,累计涨幅达到23.84%,其中,6月29日盘中更是创下10.58港元的两年半新高。据港交所披露,截至2009年6月30日,赵丹阳共持有物美商业6595.05万股,为物美商业的第一大流通股股东,以此计算,仅仅几个交易日,赵丹阳的账面就升值了近1.3亿港元(约合1680万美元),相当于8个天价午餐的费用。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-5 08:57:44 | 显示全部楼层

豪赌经济复苏 巴菲特重金出手

 巴菲特正在实施他有史以来的最大收购计划。其旗下投资旗舰巴郡本周二以作价340亿美元,全面收购全美第二大铁路营运商柏林顿北方圣塔菲(简称BNSF)全数权益。BNSF被公认为世界最大的铁路多式联运承运公司,不过在上周公布的季度盈利中,业绩比去年同期大跌30%,公司还调低盈利预测,令股价近日下跌不少。


  巴菲特当日发表声明说:“巴郡在BNSF的340亿美元投资,是对美国经济前景的一次豪赌,我喜欢这种赌博方式。”分析人士表示,巴菲特敢于在目前下大赌注,无疑是看好经济复苏的前景。巴菲特“豪赌”消息发布后,昨日A股和H股的铁路概念股纷纷大涨,走出了一波“巴菲特”行情。

  股神实施史上最大笔收购

  巴菲特旗下投资旗舰巴郡周二以作价340亿美元,全面收购全美第二大铁路营运商BNSF全数权益,这是巴菲特到目前为止所做过的最大宗收购。据了解,这笔交易已得到两家公司董事会的首肯,但尚需得到监管机构及BNSF股东的批准,双方预计交易将于明年第一季度完成。

  巴菲特此次每股100美元的收购作价,较BNSF股份周一收市有31.5%的溢价,代价将会以现金及股份支付。巴菲特本身持有BNSF铁路公司的22.6%权益。在美股周二开市前交易阶段,BNSF股价曾升29%至98.04美元。

  巴郡周二美股开市前宣布,该公司与BNSF的董事会共同宣布,双方订立正式协议,巴郡将以现金搭配股权、每股100美元的代价收购BNI流通在外的77.4%剩余股权。

巴菲特表示,对BNSF收购交易是巴郡董事会上周的决定。巴菲特在新闻记者会中表示,美国的未来繁荣离不开高效运营并良好维护的铁路系统。反过来,美国经济的增长与繁荣也将促进铁路事业的发展,但最重要的是,他这次投资是对美国经济未来的“大押注”,他喜欢这种“赌博”。巴菲特还说,在未来的10年、20年、30年,美国将会有更多的人运送更多的货物,他就是相信美国会繁荣。

  收购目标三季业绩跌三成

  BNSF运营北美洲最大的铁路之一,拥有51500公里的运营网络,遍及美国的28个州和加拿大的2个省。BNSF每年运送超过500万个集装箱和拖车,亦被公认为世界最大的铁路多式联运承运公司。不过,在上周公布的季度盈利中,BNSF业绩比去年同期大跌30%,公司还调低盈利预测。其股票目标价也遭分析师调低级别,令股价近日下跌不少。

  尽管现在还没有太多回暖迹象,不过,巴菲特并未受这些因素干扰。他说自己并不是在赌下月或明年,而是要永久拥有这家公司。他强调,投资的关键是分析一家公司的竞争优势,尤其是竞争优势的可持续性。分析公司的市场占有率增长情况,是分析其持续竞争优势的一个重要指标。分析人士认为,这笔交易展示了典型的巴菲特投资品味,即青睐那些并不靠尖端技术而实现可观赢利的公司。总部设在得克萨斯州沃思堡的BNSF被视为全美管理最佳的铁路公司之一,尽管最近一段时间它的表现落后于竞争对手,而且上个月公司调低了第四财季预期。
消息发布股价立涨

  巴菲特公布收购消息之后,BNSF的股票价值出现了上扬。其他铁路公司也跟着上涨。联合太平洋铁路公司股票价格上涨8%,至每股59.4美元;Norfolk Southern Corp股票价格上涨8%,至每股50.4美元;美国第三大铁路运营商CSX Corp公司股票也上涨了8%,至每股46.2美元。

  有分析人士表示,此项收购案或开启一轮美国铁路行业一系列的并购及收购行为,不过也有分析人士持相反意见,行业研究公司IBISWorld的高级分析师乔治?范?霍恩认为:“巴菲特斥巨资收购铁路运营商的行为可能会让很多人认为,未来会有更多的投资者对铁路行业产生兴趣。但我觉得,从目前情况来看铁路行业之间的合并现象不会立即出现。”

  香港内地股市铁路股齐涨

  巴菲特斥资340亿美元收购美国第二大铁路运营公司,消息一出,中国A股市场立即掀起一股“巴菲特”概念热,昨日A股市场铁路概念股全线大涨,尤其是铁路运营类股涨势显著,铁龙物流一度冲击涨停,大秦铁路盘中最高涨幅大6.2%,广深铁路最大涨幅也接近5%。而在H股市场,中国铁路货运午盘上涨了9.41%。

[此帖子已被 aa33 在 2009-11-5 8:58:27 编辑过]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-10-22 08:50:09 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特断言“美国病人”即将出院

对付华尔街需“萝卜”“大棒”并举

美国“股神”巴菲特今年以来已针对美国经济多次发表看法。而在美国一媒体10月20日播出的一段访谈节目中,巴菲特再度断言,过去一年中美国经济状况已出现“巨大”改善,虽然短期内不会恢复昔日的辉煌,但最坏的时刻已经过去。他说:“病人最终被及时地送到急救室,一段时间后他将手足无缺地走出病区。”

  美联储同一天公布的货币政策会议纪要显示,央行官员们普遍认为美国经济活动已出现复苏迹象,今年下半年经济增长前景改善。不过受失业等问题困扰,经济状况依然疲软,金融市场尤其是银行业仍然面临紧张局面。

  美经济已“悬崖勒马”

  巴菲特认为,与一年前相比,美国经济已经取得“巨大”改善,最坏的时期已经过去,而政府在2008年秋天采取的一系列行动是使经济“脱离悬崖”的关键。他表示,金融恐慌使得常规经济在去年第四季度遭遇重创,但目前已经摆脱了此类局势。

  “股神”的这番评论与其近来有关美国经济已经“悬崖勒马”的论调一致,而在对短期经济走势的预期上,他依旧维持一贯的谨慎,强调美国经济一时还无法回到原来的轨道上。“2008年9、10月份发生的事情会让我们长时间牢记。……但谁能预测下周或是下个月的事情呢?”巴菲特表示。

  高失业率则是令巴菲特对经济前景产生担忧的关键问题。巴菲特认为,美国消费者信心和消费支出领域还没有完全恢复,而失业率问题仍将困扰更长时间,通常来说企业要在确信需求回暖后才增加招募,“这可能需要一些时间。”

  美联储也在会议纪要中做出类似表态,称经过大幅下滑之后,美国经济现已出现反弹,消费支出似乎正在企稳,但由于失业率不断升高,消费领域依旧受到限制。

声讨华尔街

  巴菲特还对华尔街的高薪问题发出了炮轰,称当企业利润因鲁莽押注而出现下滑时,从业人员的薪酬必须“下调”。正是由于金融巨头们对次级抵押贷款市场的错误押注,才导致这些公司出现巨额亏损,最终不得不向联邦政府申请援救。

  在巴菲特看来,华尔街必须作出改变,除了“萝卜”以外还要有“大棒”。他说:“华尔街不能变成一条‘单行道’:从业人员在形势好时赚到高得荒唐的薪酬,在形势变坏的时候又能到别处躲起来。对于那些扰乱了大型金融机构的人来说,必须采取措施来降低他们的薪酬。”巴菲特在接受采访时表示,这些人中已经有大多数摆脱了他们为社会所带来的麻烦,而且“在摆脱这些麻烦的同时还很富有。”

  据纽约薪酬咨询顾问机构约翰逊事务所的预测,华尔街从业人员2009年的奖金总额将较去年增长40%,达到260亿美元。与此形成强烈对照的是,身为市值高达1500亿美元的伯克希尔?哈撒韦公司的首席执行官(CEO),巴菲特多年一直只拿10万美元的年薪。

  不过华尔街的一些金融机构仍在为其“高薪”政策寻找借口。刚刚发布强劲三季报的高盛集团被披露将向员工发放总计54亿美元的薪酬。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-3 21:46:24 | 显示全部楼层

伯克希尔哈撒韦440亿美元购美第二大铁路运营商

<DIV class=artInfo>http://www.sina.com.cn 2009年11月03日 20:46 新浪财经</DIV><DIV class=blkContainerSblkCon id=artibody><DIV align=center></DIV><DIV class=moduleSingleImg01>
</DIV>

  新浪财经讯 北京时间11月3日晚间消息,据国外媒体报道,伯克希尔哈撒韦(Berkshire Hathaway)和全美第二大铁路运营商Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation(以下简称“BNI”)董事会今天宣布,前者将以约340亿美元收购后者77%股份,将对后者持股比例提高至100%,此外还将承担后者100亿美元债务,整个交易总价值约为440亿美元。

  这将是伯克希尔哈撒韦有史以来最大的收购案。

  根据协议,伯克希尔哈撒韦将以每股100美元现金加股票收购BNI其余77%的股份,将对BNI的持股比例提高至100%。该报价比BNI周一收盘价高31%。

  伯克希尔哈撒韦董事长兼CEO沃伦-巴菲特(Warren E. Buffett)表示:“我们国家(美国)的未来繁重取决于有效率和维护良好的铁路系统。而且,美国必须保持增长并促使铁路系统繁荣。最重要的是,该交易是对美国经济未来的豪赌,我喜欢这种赌博方式。”

  BNI董事长、总裁兼CEO马修-罗斯(Matthew K. Rose)表示:“我们对有机会成为伯克希尔哈撒韦大家族的一员感到非常激动。我们钦佩巴菲特长期投资的领袖哲学,BNI将能够聚焦于铁路、客户和美国交通基础设施的未来需求。这笔交易符合我们股东、客户和员工的最大利益。”

  根据协议,BNI股东可以选择将1股BNI股票换成100美元现金或者价值相当的伯克希尔哈撒韦的Class A股票或 Class B股票。

  预计该交易将于明年第一季度完成。

  伯克希尔哈撒韦董事会还批准,将1股Class B股票拆分成50股(50-for-1 split)。

</DIV>
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-11 09:30:56 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特旗舰公司第三季利润大涨 同比增200%

美国“股神”巴菲特掌舵的投资旗舰伯克希尔?哈撒韦公司6日公布了第三季度财报。得益于股权投资及衍生品交易的价值出现大幅反弹,以及飓风等自然灾害较少提高保险利润,该公司在截至9月30日的第三季度净利润大幅增至32.4亿美元,较去年同期的10.6亿美元实现了超出200%的同比增长。

  第三季度伯克希尔公司旗下的两只重仓股富国银行及美国运通的股价分别上涨了16%及46%,而同期标准普尔500指数上涨幅度为15%。此外,衍生品投资也令伯克希尔公司获益不菲,整个第三季度,该项投资实现了17.3亿美元的利润,而去年同期则为亏损12.6亿美元。

  除去投资收益及衍生品损益,伯克希尔的第三季度经营性利润为20.6亿美元,较去年同期的20.7亿美元略有下降,但仍好于市场预期。
值得一提的是,伯克希尔的保险业务在过去一个季度中实现大幅增长,获得了3.63亿美元的利润,较去年同期的8100万美元增长348%。

  其中,因第三季度美国遭遇飓风等自然灾害侵袭的程度未达到往年水平,伯克希尔再保险业务实现了1.67亿美元的利润,好于去年同期1.66亿美元的亏损。

  不过,伯克希尔的其他经营性业务利润水平同比出现一定程度的下降。包括能源电力、食品配送、建筑材料、房地产代理及珠宝在内的非保险业务,在第三季度总计贡献了7.74亿美元的利润,而去年同期的这一数字为10.8亿美元。

  伯克希尔公司在公布财报的同时还宣布,计划融资80亿美元,以完成对铁路运营商北伯灵顿铁路公司的收购。上周初伯克希尔宣布斥资260亿美元收购北伯灵顿77%的股权,以完成对其100%的控股,而根据计划,伯克希尔将以60%现金加40%换股的方式完成这宗收购。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-14 09:46:56 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特、盖茨与学生对话:均唱好美国经济前景

据香港文汇报援引外电报道称,全球两大巨富"股神"巴菲特和微软创办人盖茨,前日一同出席纽约哥伦比亚大学商学院活动,与学生对话。两人都唱好美国经济前景,巴菲特指即使经济仍然困难,但"恐慌已经远去",称最差的投资是持有"现金";盖茨则声称看好环保能源和医药业的发展前景。
  巴菲特早前"孤注一掷",斥巨资购入铁路业巨擘Burlington Northern (BN),对美国经济投下信心一票。他向在场1000名哥大学生说:"恐慌已离我们而去。股市已经见底,不要错过一些今天有吸引力的东西。"
  他表示,去年秋天经济急挫,但他对美国经济从没担心。他又指美国比其它地方有更大的投资机会,美国经济规模远超其它经济体。
  有学生问,美股今年是否升得太高,巴菲特答道:"一个恐怖的市场或恐怖的经济是你的朋友。"告诫做股票买卖决定时,目光应放远,不要单看眼下的经济环境,否则会"犯下恐怖的错误"。
  谈到购入BN,巴菲特解释:"这国家于10、20、30年后将越来越多人,客运和货运量都会增加,最环保和最节省成本的载运就是铁路。"他指铁路运输较货车节省1/3燃料,对空气污染较少,一列火车的载运量更相当于280辆货车。
  盖茨同样对美国经济充满信心:"我们证明了会犯错,但市场主导制度的基础将持续。尽管国家处于黑暗时刻,美国商业仍然充满活力。"
  他将经济下滑归咎于人们滥用借贷,信贷危机可能令经济生产力浪费了2或3年。他形容杠杆是一种非常危险的东西。对于学生提问未来从事何种行业最有发展前途,有机会成为"盖茨第二",盖茨认为信息科技、环保能源和医药等行业未来发展势头最好,有意从事此行业者可大展拳脚。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-14 10:59:31 | 显示全部楼层
成功者的思考方式,越困难的时候越看到希望。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-16 09:12:29 | 显示全部楼层
据国外媒体报道,沃伦-巴菲特(Warren Buffett)表示,伯克希尔哈撒韦以260亿美元收购美国铁路运营商Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp。的要约“并不便宜”,未来一个世纪Burlington都将是优质资产。

  巴菲特表示,购买Burlington是对未来美国经济表现的“最大赌注”。

  为收购Burlington,巴菲特将借款80亿美元,令标准普尔可能下调伯克希尔哈撒韦AAA的信贷评级。

  巴菲特说:“未来一到两个世纪,铁路业务将与美国经济交织在一起,现在是买入铁路业务的机会。如果美国经济繁荣,铁路业务也将繁荣。”

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-11-17 16:37:01 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特买入雀巢等多家股票 对沃尔玛投资翻倍

亿万富翁"股神"巴菲特麾下伯克希尔哈撒韦公司(Berkshire Hathaway Inc)16日透露,该公司又有了新投资--收购雀巢(Nestle AG)和埃克森美孚(Exxon Mobil Corp)的股票,并且加大对沃尔玛超市的(Wal-Mart Stores Inc)投资高达一倍。
  在递交给美国证券交易委员会(U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission )的材料中,伯克希尔哈撒韦公司指出,该公司买进了世界最大食品制造商--雀巢价值价值1.447亿美元的340万份美国存托凭证;购得世界最大石油公司--埃克森美孚价值8760万美元的128万股股票;增持了全球最大零售商--沃尔玛的股份90%,由1990万股增至3780万股,价值高达18.6亿美元。
  此外,伯克希尔哈撒韦公司还斥资9630万美元和135万美元买进垃圾收集和处理服务提供商--公用服务公司(REPUBLIC SERVICES, INC.)和保险商--旅行者保险公司(Travelers Cos Inc)的股票。
  作为世界上第二首富,巴菲特没有在递交证券交易委员会的季度报告中对自己的购买和售出做出明确解释。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|徐星官网 ( 粤ICP备14047400号 )

粤公网安备 44030402005841号

GMT+8, 2025-7-5 13:25 , Processed in 0.022595 second(s), 12 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表