找回密码
 立即注册
楼主: atcoolman

The Real Warren Buffett - 巴菲特每周新闻专贴

[复制链接]
 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-14 23:07:03 | 显示全部楼层

看一纽约哥们如何调侃日本股票:缺乏商业集中度、难以捉摸的公司治理、毫不在意投资回报、高生产费用和排外的董事会,从而证实巴老98年在佛罗里达大学演讲中针对日本投资的评论是十分明智和有先见的。


Warren Buffett Is Sage of Tokyo as Well as Omaha

Commentary by William Pesek

Jan. 14 (Bloomberg) -- “I find very few wonderful businesses in Japan at present.”

That’s how Warren Buffett explained his lack of interest in the second-biggest economy to students at the University of Florida. Buffett’s gripes include “very low returns on equity” and a corporate culture that’s unresponsive to shareholders.

Japan’s markets have been battered of late by the global crisis, and the Nikkei 225 Stock Average fell more than the Dow Jones Industrial Average in 2008. Stocks in the U.S., the epicenter of the credit crunch, fell 34 percent, while Japan’s dropped 42 percent.

Buffett’s concerns explain much of the difference. And yet, the billionaire investor’s views are hardly a revelation. They are certainly not news to anyone who suffered from the Nikkei’s plunge in 2008 and 11 percent slide in 2007. What’s intriguing about Buffett’s comments is that he didn’t make them yesterday, or last month, but in October 1998.

A lot has changed in Japan. Banks rid themselves of the bad loans behind the forgettable 1990s. Companies woke up to the pressures of globalization, cutting some costs and trimming bloated workforces. Key industries, particularly automakers, have increased market share in the past 10 years.

Or have things changed very little since Buffett’s 1998 speech? Analyst John Mihaljevic, writing on the Web site Seeking Alpha, looked at corporate Japan’s evolution since then, and it’s not pretty.

Five Issues

“We approached our study of Japanese stocks with the hypothesis that we should be able to find some compelling investments given the cheap valuations of a large subset of Japanese public companies,” wrote Mihaljevic, managing editor of the Manual of Ideas in New York. “So far, however, we have remained unimpressed.”

Five specific issues are explored: a lack of business focus, murky corporate governance, little regard for returns on investment, the high cost of production, and clubby boardrooms.

Many big companies still look more like conglomerates of old than Western-style enterprises. Yes, many Western economies and companies are taking their lumps these days. Yet the lack of focus is apparent in names such as Sony Corp., which oddly has both a bank and an insurance arm.

Governance Concerns

On corporate governance, there have been modest successes. Nipponkoa Insurance Co., Japan’s fourth-largest casualty insurer, recently raised its profit target and vowed to cut costs and increase sales in response to pressure from one of its biggest shareholders: Southeastern Asset Management Inc.

Marked improvements are still few and far between. The increasing prevalence of takeover defenses and poison pills to avert mergers that may benefit shareholders is a big concern.

Companies in Japan, Mihaljevic says, routinely spend as much as 10 percent of annual revenue on capital expenditures even though they are in businesses with pretax profit margins of less than that amount.

Japan also is a high-cost center. While companies have embraced global outsourcing, many prefer to produce goods at home. That increases costs and leaves companies vulnerable to the strengthening yen. Buffett has long said high costs thwart his desire to buy an entire company in Japan.

Finally, the lack of gender diversity in boardrooms speaks to a continued unwillingness to open up the corporate culture. If there is any developed economy that needs to adopt new ways of doing business, it’s Japan.

Superior Technology

Japan is home to a highly skilled and hardworking labor force. Companies benefit from access to superior technology and manufacturing techniques. Japan also has some of the most environmentally friendly business practices anywhere.

Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc., it’s worth noting, has invested in Japanese shares here and there since 1998. In September, for example, Berkshire’s Iscar Metalworking Cos. agreed to buy a 71.5 percent stake in Tungaloy Corp., a manufacturer of tools for cars and planes.

But, Mihaljevic says, “assuming constant multiples, investors are likely to be disappointed, as they’ll be earning returns similar to the companies’ returns on equity. The latter generally range in the low- to mid-single digits and appear unlikely to rise anytime soon.”

Politics are worth considering, too. It’s hard to remember a time in the last 15 years when Japan existed in the kind of leadership vacuum that pervades the nation today. With a public support rate below 20 percent, it won’t be easy for Prime Minister Taro Aso to enact legislation to support the economy.

There’s no doubt the U.S. precipitated the global crisis. Yet Japan’s economy stopped on a dime because the government did nothing to create growth from within. Once U.S. demand dried up, Japan lost all steam.

Japan’s longest postwar expansion did little to fatten the paychecks of average households. A decade after pledging to boost domestic demand, Japan’s remains largely a one-trick economy: exports. That recognition is now reflected in stock prices.

The Nikkei was at 12,995 points on the day of Buffett’s 1998 speech. Today it’s at about 8,400. It may be time to start calling the Sage of Omaha the Sage of Tokyo, too.

(William Pesek is a Bloomberg News columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.)

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-8 01:02:18 | 显示全部楼层

晨星经过多年的斟酌,终于把2008年最佳CEO的桂冠授予巴老,下面看看他们选择巴老的理由:


Morningstar's 2008 CEO of the Year

Why investing legend Warren Buffett earned the nod for 2008's award.

By Paul A. Larson | 01-07-09 | 08:50 AM

We have contemplated naming Warren Buffett CEO of the Year every year since we created the award, and this year we finally get the chance to officially acknowledge all that Buffett has done for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)(BRK.B) shareholders, both over the decades as well as in 2008.


Beyond creating a company that treats common shareholders with the utmost fairness and respect, one needs only to look at the long-term value created at Berkshire Hathaway to see why Buffett deserves the award. Since taking the helm of the sleepy textile business 44 years ago and turning it into arguably the strongest conglomerate on the planet, Buffett and his managers have grown the book value per A share from $19 to just over $77,500, as of Sept. 30. This translates to a 20.7% annualized increase in book value since 1965, versus a mere 9.6% annualized return in the S&P 500 (including dividends) over the same time period.

And while 2008 was an exceptionally difficult year for just about all investors, it was much less trying on Berkshire Hathaway and its shareholders. Berkshire's balance sheet equity should be roughly flat from a year ago once the books are closed on 2008. More importantly, the competitive positioning and cash-flow generating ability of Berkshire's businesses remain robust.

Why 2008?
Ironically, for the first time in many years, giving the CEO of the Year award to Buffett may be a tad controversial. Among the perceived mistakes at Berkshire are the writing of large put option contracts on broad stock indexes last year, the company's $8 billion worth of investments in General Electric (GE) and Goldman Sachs (GS) in September and early October, as well as Buffett's editorial in The New York Times on Oct. 16 urging investors to "Buy American. I Am." With the market taking a sharp turn for the worse in late October and again in November, clearly the timing was not the best on these particular bullish actions.

Yet we do not view these as any reason to lose confidence in Buffett's abilities, either as an investor or corporate manager. Regarding the put options, my colleague Bill Bergman wrote an Analyst Note that explains why there is more smoke than fire around the concerns here.

Furthermore, it is worth noting that Berkshire's investments in GE and Goldman were in perpetual preferred stock, which puts Berkshire ahead of common equityholders in the capital structure of these two firms. Although the GE and Goldman warrants Berkshire received are indeed out of the money at the moment, Berkshire will still receive a handsome 10% coupon on its investments, even if the stock values of GE and Goldman never recover to their former heights. These are just the type of sweetheart deals made possible only because of the reputation and financial strength built up over many decades by Buffett's value-creating decisions.

And if one still believes that Buffett has lost his edge, witness what value was recently created in Berkshire's dealings with Constellation Energy (CEG). On Sept. 18, Berkshire agreed to buy Constellation for $4.7 billion and soon thereafter invested $1 billion into the firm. Without this lifeline of both cash and confidence, Constellation would have likely not survived the credit crisis. While Constellation ultimately elected to walk away from the merger with Berkshire to go with a rival restructuring plan, Berkshire's initial investment turned into a $1 billion note paying 14%, a $175 million termination fee, and a 10% equity stake in Constellation currently worth about $500 million. It takes quite the poker player to be able to successfully make such a low-risk, high-return bet, and have it play out inside of three months' time.

Avoiding the Wreck
Investors can learn a lot from studying Buffett's actions, but his decisions to stay on the sidelines are also notable. Indeed, he steered Berkshire Hathaway from many of the temptations that have caused competitors to crash and burn this past year. For instance, Buffett warned back in 2003 that derivatives were "financial weapons of mass destruction" that are "time bombs, both for the parties that deal in them and the economic system." Given all that has transpired in 2008, these statements--and Berkshire's actions--look especially prescient. While American International Group (AIG), Ambac (ABK), and other competitors now wallow in bankruptcy or near-bankruptcy, Berkshire is as financially healthy as ever.

Beyond derivatives, Berkshire also avoided excessive leverage back when credit was flowing a little too easy and asset prices were too high. In mid-2007, the opening salvos of the credit crisis were being shot across the subprime mortgage market, and many financial firms were levered to the hilt. Yet Berkshire had $47 billion--over one third of its equity at the time--in cash and cash equivalents, most of it unencumbered. By practicing prudence and patience earlier in the decade, Berkshire was in a position to put large amounts of capital to work in 2008. In other words, rather than blowing its ammunition hunting squirrels a few years ago, Berkshire has been able to shoot the proverbial elephants now walking by.

An Enviable Partner
Of course, we've always preferred managers who do not view the companies they run as their personal piggy banks. As a shareholder of Berkshire Hathaway (both personally as well as in Morningstar StockInvestor's Tortoise Portfolio), I think we as owners are getting one heck of a deal by paying Buffett a $100,000 salary. (He earns less than $200,000 in total compensation annually.) Buffett allows his significant ownership stake in Berkshire to act as motivation enough to perform well as a manager, which nearly perfectly aligns his interests with those of common shareholders.

In 1996, Buffett scribed an "Owner's Manual" booklet for Berkshire shareholders where he spelled out some of the broad principles used to guide the management of the company. The very first principle said this:

"Although our form is corporate, our attitude is partnership. Charlie Munger and I think of our shareholders as owner-partners, and of ourselves as managing partners."

While many corporate managers may say they are positive and careful stewards of owner capital, few overtly view common shareholders for what they really are--partners. For being a successful managing partner, both in principle as well as in practice, Warren Buffett is our 2008 CEO of the Year.

Featured Video: Our take on Berkshire's value creation both in 2008 and over the long term. Click to watch.

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-10 16:28:23 | 显示全部楼层

华尔街日报尝试分析美国陶氏化学公司(Dow Chemical,道氏化学公司)如何解决其153亿美元巨额并购贷款的出路,拿巴老做标题不过是一个幌子,吸引眼球。可是从侧面倒是看到美国评级机构(标普和穆迪)对上市公司的评级,居然会有如此大的影响和压力,以至于公司管理层不得不采取一切办法,缓和评级机构的严厉语气。

PS:

文中给出中国弥补科威特离去空缺的可能性。


January 8, 2009, 12:50 pm

Could Warren Buffett Save Dow Chemical?

Posted by Heidi N. Moore

For Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris, failure isn’t an option.

Liveris has a tough juggle ahead of him to complete his company’s $15.3 billion acquisition of Rohm & Haas. Ever since Liveris beat out rival BASF to win Rohm in a bidding war in July, he has touted Rohm’s ability to boost Dow’s profile and earnings. His reputation?and Dow’s strategy?rides on completing the Rohm deal. “He can’t walk away from the transformation message,” said one investor watching the deal. “It would be like Obama walking away from the ‘change’ message.”

buffett0108_D_20090108134622.jpg

<DIV align=center>Getty Images</DIV><DIV align=left> </DIV>

But as of Thursday, Dow’s market value was $14 billion, meaning investors believe the company is worth at least $1 billion less than the price it is paying for Rohm. Meantime, Liveris must find $7.5 billion to replace funds that had been promised in Dow’s now-collapsed joint venture with Kuwait. Regulatory approvals for the Rohm deal are expected to come through this week, which means Liveris will be required to close the deal by next week, whether he has arranged financing or not.

Liveris has said his priority is to preserve Dow’s investment-grade credit rating. And Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service cut the company’s rating to within two notches of junk last week and have Dow on credit watch for further downgrades. That means Liveris probably can’t pay for Rohm by tapping all of a one-year, $13 billion bridge loan that 18 banks have promised, because taking on that much debt would hurt Dow’s credit rating.

So Deal Journal wanted to look at some ways that Dow could still save its deal. They are in order of how realistic the options may be.

1. Cut the dividend

Liveris has sworn to keep paying Dow’s dividend, a part of the company’s relationship with its stockholders since 1912. There is no pressing reason do so, except pride. Liveris needs $7.5 billion to pay for Rohm & Haas and preserve Dow’s capital structure in the process. Cutting the $1.5 billion yearly dividend won’t get him all the way there, but it would be a big step forward. And Dow’s dividend yield is already a whopping 11%.

2. Returning to the Buffett line

Liveris could try to persuade Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway to buy another $2 billion or so of Dow’s convertible preferred shares. Liveris told Bloomberg News that Buffett, who invested $3 billion in Dow last year to boost its chances of winning Rohm, stands by his investment even though his convertible preferred shares are underwater. Buffett’s shares, which hold an 8.5% dividend, have a strike price of $41.32. Dow shares recently were at $15.89. Perhaps Liveris could lure more Buffett investment by renegotiating Buffett’s holdings at a lower price, enabling Buffett to earn a better return if and when Dow’s shares bounce back.

3. Go begging to Kuwait

Liveris told Bloomberg he felt Kuwait’s decision to pull out of the $17.4 billion joint venture was “nothing personal,” a savvy thing to say as Dow has at least four other joint ventures with the oil-rich Middle Eastern nation. Still, Liveris said this week he would sue Kuwait to get a $2.5 billion breakup fee?or even more in potential damages. Kuwait said Thursday it believes it owes Dow nothing. In threatening such an important partner, perhaps Liveris was just giving himself negotiating room to offer to drop the threat of litigation if, say, Kuwait agrees to put more money into financing the Rohm & Haas deal.

4.Throw Dow on the mercy of the ratings providers

Liveris needs to impress S&P and Moody’s, whose primary concern is how Dow would refinance that huge $13 billion bridge loan in one year. Dow has just cut its production capacity 30%?meaning lower revenue to come and thus less money to pay down the loan. Still, Liveris may have made some headway in getting breathing room from S&P, which released a report Wednesday explaining its stance on the deal.

We maintained the CreditWatch status to indicate the potential for another downgrade if the company doesn’t announce meaningful steps toward that end soon. However, the CreditWatch status will provide a short amount of time for Dow to develop and disclose detailed plans to address our concerns, particularly related to the bridge loan refinancing. We believe that Dow remains highly committed to its investment-grade financial policies and expect that the company will announce plans to mitigate our credit concerns.

Liveris will have to back up any promises with action, as S&P expects Dow to come up with as much as $15 billion of cash:

To close the Rohm and Haas acquisition, we believe that Dow will need about $15 billion of external financing, including the $4 billion of cumulative convertible perpetual preferred stock that two large investors [Kuwait and Buffett] have committed. Based on the initial funding plan, we anticipated that Dow would initially draw about $4 billion of the bridge loan after receiving the K-Dow proceeds to close the transaction. Under the current scenario, without the K-Dow proceeds, the bridge loan drawdown is likely to be $11 billion or more. We view this as the most significant change related to the announcement last week. To preserve the existing ratings, Dow will have to demonstrate that it has the wherewithal, despite the difficult business and financial market conditions, to extend this debt so that the capital structure and debt maturity profile remain consistent with the investment-grade ratings. The company would have to provide sufficient details about the plan, and the plan would have to be highly certain for a rating committee to determine that investment-grade ratings remain appropriate.

5. Negotiate a longer-term bridge loan

Can Liveris turn a one-year bridge loan into a two-year loan? It probably would be a costly solution, if the 18 lenders would even agree to it. The banks would likely ask for a rich interest rate?perhaps as much as the benchmark London interbank offered rate plus 4.5 percentage points. Still, it might give him more breathing room with the ratings providers.

6. Find a new joint-venture partner

If Kuwait won’t help Liveris, perhaps another cash-rich country will. China is the customer for much of the petrochemicals produced in the Middle East, so perhaps Middle Kingdom could step into the Middle East country’s shoes. Liveris said this week that Dow has received calls from two potential partners to replace Kuwait, and he expects six more to jump into the fray within six months. Can he afford that kind of time? It took two years for Dow to negotiate with Kuwait, and that fell apart, while Dow’s financing agreements with Kuwait and Buffett expire in July. Still, a quickly signed, firmly negotiated joint-venture deal would show the ratings providers that Dow expects more money soon.

There are some solutions not explored here, such as trying to renegotiate the Rohm price below the $78-a-share offer. That is because he has no legal basis to do so: the Rohm & Haas agreement is firm, with no legal outs for Dow.

Liveris’s next move is anyone’s guess. But if he can juggle his myriad demands and appease the skeptics, he will regain the approbation received when he first signed the Rohm deal a year ago.

Update: It appears that there are signs of a rift between Dow and Rohm & Haas about the future of this deal. Rohm & Haas issued a press release just now confirming that it has received EU regulatory clearances. It is highly unusual for the target company to issue such a release (usually it would be Dow’s job as the acquirer). And the “do we have to do everything ourselves?” tone will not give investors much faith in Dow’s efforts: “The sole remaining regulatory clearance necessary for the transaction to close is that of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. Rohm and Haas Company continues to work diligently towards completing the proposed transaction with Dow in early 2009.” Be assured that arbs will ask why Rohm “continues to work diligently” with no mention of its partner, Dow, doing the same.

Related on Deal Journal

Parsing Dow Chemical CEO Andrew Liveris
Dow Chemical: Lenders Stand by CEO Liveris
Dow Chemical’s Tale of Woe
Dow Chemical’s breakup fee as down payment?
Will Rohm & Haas Be Enough For Dow Chemical CEO?
Dow Chemical: Cutting Jobs Instead of the Merger Price
Spooked Investors Fear Dow Chemical CEO’s Words on Merger
Romeo and Pedro’s Not-So-Excellent Dow Chemical Adventure
Jamie Dimon: The Man in the Middle at Dow Chemical
Deal Profile: Dow Chemical’s Big Deal for Rohm & Haas
Banking Ethics 101: How J.P. Morgan Fought Itself on Dow Chemical and Won
Banking Ethics 202: J.P. Morgan and ‘Plausible Deniability’ on Dow Chemical

[此帖子已被 atcoolman 在 2009-1-10 16:42:19 编辑过]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-13 01:17:36 | 显示全部楼层

相信各位巴迷一定留意到自07年伯克希尔?哈撒韦首次购入铁路运营商BNSF后,其并没有就此终止,而是一直不断在二级市场上增持,甚至不惜动用‘卖出期权’,诱惑其他人为他收货。今天来一篇华人Ph.D的文章,就此事进行分析解读:


Burlington Northern Santa Fe: What's Buffett's Strategy?

by: Eric Kuang January 11, 2009

Ever since the first quarter of 2007, Warren Buffett’s Bershire Hathaway (BRK.A) has been buying into Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. (BNI). By April 5, 2007, he bought more than 39 million shares. The Berkshire Hathaway 2007 Annual Report states that as of December 31, he held more than 60.8 million shares or 17.5% of the company. Throughout 2008, Buffett just kept on buying, either in the open market or sold put options and got shares “put” to him as the exercise price. As of December 11, 2008, GuruFocus reported that Warren Buffett held a little over 70 million shares of BNI, or 20.47% of all the shares outstanding.

<DIV id=article_info>

Through subsidiaries or subsidiaries of subsidiaries, Berkshire Hathaway has woven together an empire consisting of 10 insurance companies and 66 non-insurance businesses. Besides that, as of December 31, 2007, it holds $141 billion worth of investment: stocks, bonds, and cash equivalent. BNI is bought as a stock holding. But as the percentage of ownership changes, one could not help speculating that it may one day become a Berkshire Hathaway controlled operating company.

Warren Buffett has stated on several occasions that good investment ideas are hard to come by; 15 years ago he stated that between him and Charlie Munger, combined, they were quite happy if they could come up with one good investment idea each year. Undoubtedly, BNI is one of those ideas, else it would not worth spending more than $5.5 billion dollars and two years to accumulate a little over 20%.

Warren Buffett does not buy more than 20% of a company from the open market easily. As of December 31, 2007, his top stock holdings in terms of dollar amounts include American Express (AXP) (13.1%), Coca-Cola (KO) (8.6%), Procter & Gamble (PG)(3.3%) and Wells Fargo (WFC) (9.2%); his top holdings in terms of percentage of ownership include: Moody’s Corporation (MCO) (19.1%), Washington Post Company (WPC) 18.2%), Burlington Northern Santa Fe (17.5%), and USG Corp (USG) (17.2%). Numbers in the parentheses are ownership percentages. Like his operating companies, most of the significant investment positions, once established, rarely change. Many of the positions have been established and stayed there forever. It's worth noticing that there are several names in which he has held close to 20% for many years. Breaching the 20% line is a big deal for Warren Buffett.

In theory, Warren Buffett can own any percentage between 0 and 100%. In practice, however, he seems to prefer either under 20% or above 50%; in other words, either as investments or as a controlled operating company. This is especially true in recent years. In his 1980 Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders, Warren Buffett gave a crash course on Non-controlled Ownership Earnings. For companies 50% owned, one needs to fully consolidate all financial results; for companies between 20 to 50% owned, only the proportional earning needs to be included in the Income Statement; for holdings with less than 20% ownership, only dividends received are reported as earning.

Warren Buffett does not base his investment decisions on how the earnings are treated in accounting, so it is not obvious from these accounting rules why he avoids holdings between 20% to 50%. I guess when the acquisition price is not of concern, if an idea is good enough to justify a 20% ownership, it might as well justify a 50% ownership.

Perhaps Warren Buffett’s acquisition of GEICO offers a case study for what might be happening with BNI. In his 1995 Letter to Shareholders, Buffett gave a good account of his investment love affair with GEICO. Aside from flirting with the stock as a young investor in the 1950s as the Chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway, he started to buy into GEICO in 1976. By the end of 1980, Berkshire Hathaway owned 33.3% of GEICO. During the next 15 years, he did not make any further purchases, but his interest in GEICO grew to about 50% because the latter was a big purchaser of its own shares. Then, in 1995, Berkshire Hathaway offered $2.3 billion for the other 50% of the company and took the company private.

BNI has also been a diligent purchaser of its own stock, according to GuruFocus data. From December 1998 to September 2008, the company’s shares outstanding shrank from 469 million to 344 million, declining at an annual rate of 2.9%. If the company continues to reduce its shares outstanding and/or Buffett keeps on adding to his position, it won’t before too long before he owns more than 50% of the company.

Will that happen? Many Warren Buffett watchers are anxious to see; some of them even have some money invested along with the guru.

2009 will be an interesting year for the story to unfold.

Disclosure: no positions

</DIV><DIV> </DIV><DIV> </DIV>
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-1-14 01:53:33 | 显示全部楼层

再来一个小事件,事关伯克希尔?哈撒韦旗下子公司收购一家地区性样板房提供商,呵呵。


Buffett subsidiary acquires local dealer of model homes
By Michael Hooper
The Capital-Journal
Published Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Clayton Homes, a subsidiary of Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc., has acquired Kaw Valley Homes, a Lawrence-based model home seller with operations in Topeka.

In Topeka, Kaw Valley Homes is located at 4919 S.W. Topeka Blvd., where there has been a manufactured home dealer since the 1950s.

Entrepreneur Jack Reed started Kaw Valley Homes in 1978 in the Kansas City area and moved it to Lawrence in 1981. Reed purchased the Topeka store in 1998 from Rod Taylor.

In 2000, Jack Reed sold the business to ARC, of Denver. ARC sold it in 2003 to Jack Reed's sons, Allen and Dean Reed. Five years later, the Reeds sold their business to Clayton Homes on Sept. 30 for an undisclosed amount, Allen Reed said on Monday.

Allen Reed said it has been more difficult getting financing for clients, but Clayton has a financing division ready to loan money.

Reed said sales were down in 2008, but customers were still buying manufactured homes.

The average sales price for Kaw Valley Homes in 2008 was $105,000.

Clayton Homes Inc. was founded in 1956 and acquired by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in 2003 after Buffett read a book about the history of Clayton Homes.

Kevin Clayton, chief executive officer of Clayton Homes said, "We are delighted to have Allen and Dean join the Clayton family. We strive to be No. 1 in value and No. 1 in customer experience, and are thrilled to have such a successful and well-known family join us."

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-17 16:28:58 | 显示全部楼层

“股神”巴菲特增持富国银行

美国“股神”巴菲特的投资旗舰巴郡在首季多只股票价格低迷时,购入了很多便宜货,包括增持1240万股富国银行,现拥有逾3亿股,继续成为最大股东。

  据香港《文汇报》报道,巴菲特此外还增持150万股US Bancorp,现拥有该银行6900万股。巴郡并增持390万股强生。

  早在月初巴郡股东年会上已透露买进银行股的消息,他当时说,认为USBancorp和富国都是极稳健的银行,乐意以当前股价投资。这两行的股价在首季跌至逾10年低位,富国3月份股价跌至9美元,但近月上升不少,前天收市报24.87美元。

  此外,“金融大鳄”索罗斯首季减持500万股巴西石油公司Petrobras,但增持零售股,包括135万股沃尔玛,持股量增加至182万股,又买入另一大型连锁百货公司Macy928万股。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-18 07:13:42 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特最关注新能源行业

 5月16日,《滚雪球》(巴菲特生平唯一授权的传记)作者艾丽斯?施罗德在北京接受中国媒体采访时透露,巴菲特认为中国的投资机会远远多于美国,而且他看好新能源企业。
  在回答早报记者提问时,施罗德一度潸然泪下,坦言朋友的陆续离去让巴菲特这位70多岁的老人对金钱的关注度下降了。
  芒格首先相中比亚迪
  施罗德说,巴菲特一直比较看好中国的资本市场,认为中国将是决定世界经济未来增长最重要的因素之一。在施罗德眼里,巴菲特最关心的问题是中国资本市场的监管程度,"巴菲特要研究哪些中国企业的类型与他的投资理念和投资风格是匹配的,巴菲特对科技类企业不太感兴趣,但对能源类企业很感兴趣。"
  去年9月,巴菲特注资18亿美元购买比亚迪股份增发的2.25亿股H股,占股10%。半年多时间里,比亚迪股份已经由当时的8.4港元上涨至目前的25.6元,涨幅达200%。施罗德相信,巴菲特不会卖掉比亚迪股份,因为这不是他的作风,对于喜欢的公司巴菲特不会轻易出售。
  巴菲特的老搭档芒格对像比亚迪这样的新能源企业是很感兴趣的,这个投资创意也是芒格首先提出的。
  "巴菲特年轻的时候对小企业的股票很关注。他会对小企业的状况进行仔仔细细的调研,甚至与企业管理层进行了会晤,到他们的仓库看一看,看他们生产什么样的产品。"施罗德说,"现在中国就有这样的机会,因为中国有很多新兴的企业,而在美国这样的机会不多了。"
  股票比大宗商品有价值
  作为巴菲特投资理念的推崇者,施罗德说,持有股票比持有大宗商品更有价值,购买股票所代表的公司将来会盈利、会带来利润,而买入大宗商品更多意义上是一种投机。
  施罗德认为,可在全球多元化的基础上持有股票,选择那些近期上涨不多的市场,目前的情况下,中国、欧元区和美国的股市都要在回调之后才值得介入。
  施罗德透露,《滚雪球》是自己在2003年开始创作的,6个月之后巴菲特的夫人苏珊被诊断出患有口腔癌,后来她就去世了,并且在这段时间巴菲特有数个朋友去世,这些亲友的离去使巴菲特的人生观发生了重大的变化。
  在这段时间,嗜财如命的巴菲特对金钱的关注度下降了,他和自己家人开始异常亲近,对自己的家人和孩子也更慷慨了,尽管没有像对全人类那样的慷慨,但毫无疑问,工作在他人生中的重要性下降了。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-26 17:32:51 | 显示全部楼层

巴菲特增持银行和铁路运输股 首季组合落后市场

5月15日巴菲特的伯克希尔公司向美国证监会申报2009年一季度末最新持股情况。与2008年底相比,巴菲特的股票投资组合出现了以下重大变化:
一、主要受累于银行股大跌,一季度巴菲特股票组合落后于市场

  2009年一季度末巴菲特股票投资组合总市值为408.7亿美元,与2008年末的518.7亿美元相比,减少了110亿,下降了21.2%。

  以一季度末收盘价计算,巴菲特增持6家公司股票市值合计为8.35亿美元,巴菲特减持4家公司股票市值合计为5.52美元,增减相抵,巴菲特净增持2.83美元,相对于投资组合总市场408亿美元而言,净增持比例不到1%,因此总体而言巴菲特一季度股票组合变化不大。

  一季度美国标准普尔500指数下跌了10.42%,相对而言,巴菲特股票组合市值下跌21.2%,大幅落后于市场。但是二季度以来巴菲特持有的大部分股票大涨,因此对于擅长长期投资的巴菲特,并不能只以一个季度的短期业绩来论输赢。

  分析表明,巴菲特股票组合市值下跌的最主要原因是银行股价大跌。巴菲特持有的6只银行股一季度市值累计下跌58亿美元,占其组合市值下跌110亿美元的一半以上。其中:富国银行股价下跌52%,巴菲特持股市值下跌42.5亿美元;美国合众银行股价下跌42%,巴菲特持股市值下跌6.8亿美元;美国银行股价下跌52%,巴菲特持股市值下跌0.36亿美元;美国运通股价下跌27%,巴菲特持股市值下跌7.5亿美元;M&T银行股价下跌21%,巴菲特持股市值下跌0.82亿美元。Sun Trusts银行股价下跌60%,巴菲特持股市值下跌0.57亿美元。但是二季度以来银行股大涨,4月1日到5月20日,富国银行大涨72%,美国合众银行上涨26%,美国银行大涨68%,美国运通大涨66%,M&T银行上涨6%,Sun Trusts银行上涨29%。
另外,巴菲特的4只重仓股跌幅也较大。第三大重仓股宝洁一季度股价下跌24%,巴菲特持股市值下跌14.19亿美元;第四大重仓股伯灵顿铁路股价下跌21%,尽管巴菲特增持10%,其持股市值仍然下跌了6.88亿美元。第五大重仓股康菲石油一季度股价下跌24%,加上巴菲特减持股份11%,巴菲特持股市值下跌13.49亿美元。第六大重仓股卡夫食品一季度股价下跌17%,巴菲特持股市值下跌6.31亿美元。这四大重仓股市值累计减少了41亿美元,占其组合市值下跌110亿美元三分之一以上。但是二季度以来这四只股票明显上涨,4月1日到5月20日,宝洁上涨16%,伯灵顿铁路上涨16%,康菲石油上涨18%,卡夫食品上涨11%。
二、巴菲特增持银行和铁路运输股

  以一季度末收盘价计算,巴菲特增持6家公司股票市值合计为8.35亿美元。

  巴菲特增持两只铁路股4.26亿美元,其中,伯灵顿铁路增持股份比例9.5%,增持股份市值4亿美元;联合太平洋(601099)增持股份比例7.3%,增持股份市值0.26亿美元;可见其对铁路运输行业仍然看好。二季度以来这2只股票明显上涨,4月1日到5月20日,伯灵顿铁路上涨16%,联合太平洋上涨17%,巴菲特没少赚。

  巴菲特增持两只银行股2亿美元,其中,富国银行增持股份比例4.3%,增持股份市值1.76亿美元;美国合众银行增持股份比例2.2%,增持股份市值0.22亿美元;尽管富国银行一季度股价大跌52%,巴菲特仍然增持,甚至在股东大会上宣称有机会想100%持有富国银行,可见其对富国银行信心之在。但是二季度以来银行股大涨,4月1日到5月20日,富国银行大涨72%,美国合众银行上涨26%,巴菲特赚大了。

  巴菲特在2008年大幅减持强生后,一季度又开始增持,增持股份比例13.6%,增持股份市值2亿美元。二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日强生上涨了6%。

  巴菲特增持Nalco水处理公司股份比例3%,增持股份市值0.034亿美元。二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日Nalco上涨了31%。
三、巴菲特认错减持康菲石油

  以一季度末收盘价计算,巴菲特减持4家公司股票市值合计为5.52美元。

  巴菲特减持康菲石油股份比例为10.9%,减持市值3.39亿美元,在康菲石油一季度股价下跌24%而二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日上涨18%的情况仍然减持,值得关注。

  巴菲特减持星座能源股份比例为25.5%,减持市值1.05亿美元。二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日星座能源上涨24%。

  巴菲特减持联合保健股份比例为28.6%,减持市值0.38亿美元。二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日联合保健上涨33%。

  巴菲特减持Carmax股份比例为32%,减持市值0.7亿美元,估计与美国汽车销量持续有关。二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日Carmax下跌17%,看来巴菲特减持得很及时。

四、巴菲特继续重仓金融业和消费品行业

  从行业比重来看,巴菲特继续重仓金融业和消费品行业。与2008年底相比,一季度末各行业比重有所变化:消费品从36.9%上升到41.1%,金融业从29.6降至23%,工业从14.5%上升至16.6%,石油天然气从8%降至6.8%,消费服务从5.1%升至5.9%,医药保健从4.4%升至5.2%,公用事业从1.5%降至1.4%。

 五、巴菲特继续高度集中投资

  2009年一季度巴菲特共持有41只股票,前十大重仓股市值占整个投资组合的84.6%,前十大重仓股市值占整个投资组合的62%,组合集中度仍然很高。

  结论:分析一季度巴菲特股票投资组合以上变化表明,巴菲特在股价大幅下滑的情况下,并没有大幅减持,而且继续增仓银行股和铁路股,继续重仓消费股和金融股,显示其对美国走出金融危机和经济复苏有很大信心,也兑现了他2008年在纽约时报上公开号召买入美股的诺言。尽管一季度巴菲特股票组合表现不佳,但二季度以来从4月1日到5月20日大部分持股也有较大上涨,尤其是增持的股票,看来我们要对以长期投资著称的巴菲特的长期业绩更有信心。

  对于中国投资者而言,一季度中国经济数据比美国好得多,一季度中国股市上证指数大涨30%,比美国股市大跌10%要好得多。巴菲特对美国经济和美国股市未来长期表现如此有信心,我们对中国经济和中国股市未来长期表现应该更有信心。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-27 10:54:17 | 显示全部楼层

传巴菲特拟入股 东北电气H股7交易日暴涨86.8%

在A股市场面临退市的*ST东电,近日因“股神”可能入股的传闻在香港市场遭爆炒,短短七个交易日,H股股价由0.76港元飙升至1.42港元,累计涨幅达86.8%。

  近日,有传闻称,在5月2日召开的柏克夏尔股东大会上,巴菲特表示,中国广大的农村地区未来对电网设备的需求将是巨大的,因此,他打算在中国的许可下,大量入股低价的国营电网设备股。传闻更言之凿凿地指出,巴菲特目前正与东北电气的大股东香港中央结算(代理人)有限公司洽谈股权转让事宜。

此语传出,惊动了“股神”的追随者,经过一番绞尽脑汁的分析后,“巴粉”们猜测,巴老所指的“低价的国营电网设备股”可能就是东北电气。

  东北电气1995年在香港发行H股25795万股,同年向内地社会公众公开发行A股3000万股,并于1995年12月13日在深圳证券交易所上市交易。但今年4月1日起,这个有国资背景的东北电气因连续两年亏损,被实行退市风险警示处理,公司今年一季度仍未走出亏损的阴影,再次亏损851万元人民币。由于业绩不理想,该公司的H股自去年10月份触底以来一直于1港元以下徘徊。

  国家电网总经理刘振亚在近日召开的2009特高压输电技术国际会议上,提出了将建设坚强智能电网的目标,市场预期智能电网规划将于7月出台。这就给主营业务为电力电容器及封闭母线等系统保护及传输设备的制造和营销的东方电气(600875)提供了良好的发展机遇。因此,就是这样一家面临退市风险的上市公司,在市场的揣测加憧憬下,被连日推动。昨日,东北电气H股连续收出第七根大阳线,全日大幅飙升20.34%,盘中一度刷新近年半新高至1.6港元。

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-5-29 21:00:46 | 显示全部楼层
呵呵,看来可以买几股哈撒韦B股,然后去奥马哈参加巴菲特的股东会
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|徐星官网 ( 粤ICP备14047400号 )

粤公网安备 44030402005841号

GMT+8, 2025-1-16 10:02 , Processed in 0.023847 second(s), 12 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表