找回密码
 立即注册
楼主: atcoolman

The Real Warren Buffett - 巴菲特每周新闻专贴

[复制链接]
发表于 2009-3-2 11:18:51 | 显示全部楼层

富国银行22元的买入价,是用股东信中67.02亿的COST除以3.04392068亿股得出的,巴老在2005年开始,每年都大量增持富国银行,2004年持股0.56亿股,2005年持股0.95亿股,2006年持股2.18亿股,2007年持股3.03亿股,所以成本在不断提高。如果按照2008年的收市价计算,是29.48元,还是有盈利的,按照2009.2.27二月末收市价计算,是12.1元,亏损幅度为45.04%,帐面损失金额是52.9亿美元。康菲石油的计算方法相同。

另,综合去年的新闻信息,巴老自己个人帐户买入的股份就是富国银行。

[此帖子已被 lewie 在 2009-3-2 11:25:05 编辑过]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-7 23:20:26 | 显示全部楼层

尽管处在大熊市,巴老也随行就市,推出看空期权,吸引一众赌徒为其吸货。那么,到底是赌徒厉害,还是庄家精明?答案已揭晓,gurufocus网站对Berkshire Hathway自去年6月以来推出的所有看空期权的实际买入成本和行权日的收市价进行比较,发现Berkshire为此节省了两千万美元购入成本。


Buffett Saves Berkshire Hathaway $20 Million with the Puts on Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Feb. 03, 2009

Buffett Saves Berkshire Hathaway $20 Million with the Puts on Burlington Northern Santa Fe

2.3 million shares of Burlington Northern Santa Fe (NYSE: BNI) was put to Berkshire Hathaway at the strike price of $75 a share on Jan. 30. Now all the BNI put options Warren Buffett sold have been exercised.

Berkshire had a 1.8% loss with the Jan. 30 BNI puts compared with the market close prices. Since Oct. 2008 we have made a series of reports on Buffett’s put sales. Warren Buffett sold a total of 7.8 million shares of puts on BNI. Now all of these put contracts have been exercised.

Berkshire spent a net of $548.7 million on these 7.8 million BNI shares. If bought in open market at market close prices on the days the puts were exercised, Berkshire’s cost would have been $569.4 million. Warren Buffett saved about $20 million or 3.8% on these BNI shares.

With these purchases Berkshire Hathaway now controls 76,777,029 shares of Burlington Northern, which is more than 22% of total shares outstanding. There is speculation that Buffett may take BNI private. (See: What if Buffett takes BNI private - good or bad for the rest of us?)

Today BNI is traded at around $65, a 3-year low. Although Buffett made small profit with the put sales, he still has at least 15% of paper loss with this BNI shares. If you buy BNI today, you are better positioned than Buffett to make money on Burlington Northern Santa Fe.

This is the summary of the puts sale of Warren Buffett:



Derivative SecurityExercise PriceTransaction DateShares soldDate ExercisablePriceShare Cost if ExecersedPrice on Date of Exercise (close)Option Gain
Put Option (obligation to buy)$75 12/3/20082,325,0001/30/2008$6.35 $68.65 $ 67.42 -1.8%
Put Option (obligation to buy)$76 10/16/20081,000,00012/19/2008$6.20 $69.80 $ 74.68 7.0%
Put Option (obligation to buy)$75 10/10/20081,217,50012/12/2008$7.09 $67.91 $ 74.68 10.0%
Put option (obligation to buy)$80 10/8/20081,190,47612/9/2008$7.03 $72.97 $ 75.20 3.1%
Put option (obligation to buy)$77 10/8/2008761,11112/9/2008$5.78 $71.22 $ 75.20 5.6%
Put option (obligation to buy)$80 10/6/20081,309,52412/8/2008$7.02 $72.98 $ 76.55 4.9%

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-9 22:33:25 | 显示全部楼层

再回头看看巴老对哈雷的投资:


Published Sunday February 8, 2009
Warren Watch: Berkshire helps Harley through rough patch
BY STEVE JORDON
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

The price of Harley-Davidson Inc.'s stock jumped as much as 22 percent Tuesday on news of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s $300 million investment in the Milwaukee motorcycle company.


Warren Buffett, who posed with a motorcycle during Berkshire Hathaway's shareholder meeting in 2006, is lending Harley-Davidson Inc. $300 million, with an annual interest rate of 15 percent.

But it won't solve the problems faced by the last major American cycle manufacturer, which says it is considering taking part in a federal bailout program to improve its finances. This wasn't a case of Warren Buffett buying a big percentage of a company that fits his model of a well-managed, highly profitable business with a long future ahead of it.

Rather, it's a loan by cash-rich Berkshire to a company that needs the money so badly it's willing to pay 15 percent per year for as long as five years so that more people can buy motorcycles on credit.

Last week, Harley's stock price floated back toward its Jan. 23 price of $11.50 a share, the lowest since June 1997, before settling Friday at $14.42.

That was down more than 80 percent from its peak of $75.50 in November 2006, including a drop of about $30 since Harley announced last August that sales were down 10 percent and that it would cut production as much as 40 percent to control inventory.

Motorcycle sales last year declined 8 percent, thanks to the recession, the company said. While fourth-quarter profit was down 58 percent, Harley-Davidson still recorded a profit ? no small deed these days for a U.S. motor vehicle manufacturer.

Harley's turnaround plan includes closing or consolidating four plants and cutting 1,100 jobs.

Berkshire's $300 million, plus another $300 million from Davis Selected Advisers LP, a Tucson investment company that also is Harley's largest shareholder, will go to Harley-Davidson Financial Services.

That's Harley's financing division, which makes loans to Harley dealers and to retail customers in the United States and Canada. More of those loans have gone bad, and Harley expects defaults to worsen this year because of the recession.

The president of the finance division made a "personal decision to resign," the company said, and the corporate chief financial officer is serving as interim president. Longtime CEO James L. Ziemer plans to retire this year after a 40-year career, and Harley is searching for a successor.

Buffett certainly wishes Harley-Davidson well. Berkshire's Geico insurance unit sells plenty of motorcycle insurance and recently brought a custom-made Harley to the annual meeting of Berkshire shareholders in Omaha.

But Berkshire will profit from its $300 million bond purchase even if Harley's stock price keeps falling and even if the company begins losing money. As long as Harley makes its bond payments, that 15 percent return isn't too shabby.

Harley said it has additional credit needs and is looking into a troubled-asset loan program that the Federal Reserve began in November to make credit available to businesses.

The Harley-Davidson bonds are basically IOUs, which carry no guarantees. Other debts would come first if Harley were unable to repay all it owes.

Because of the risk involved, Harley is paying Berkshire 15 percent interest at a time when rates on low-risk loans are low.

'Stale' strategies?


Bloggers are fighting over whether Warren Buffett's recent financial plays have been wrong or wise.

Darren Rickard of the Stock Market & Business Blog sought to refute Doug Kass of RealMoney Silver and TheStreet.com, who said Buffett's strategies are "stale" and don't work these days.

Kass cited the declining value of several investments Buffett has made since last fall, plus the 38 percent drop in Berkshire Hathaway's own stock price.

Rickard said such criticism is shortsighted and that critics "haven't given Buffett's big bets a time to play out."

"Warren Buffett has faced similar stock market and economic meltdowns before, bet huge sums while stocks were affected by these meltdowns and always managed to come out smelling of roses," Rickard wrote.

Attention getter


Microsoft founder Bill Gates, whose foundation will receive the bulk of Warren Buffett's wealth, wanted to prove a point during the recent Technology, Entertainment, Design Conference in Long Beach, Calif.

He told the technology experts, politicians and Hollywood actors and actresses at the meeting that one of the foundation's goals is to eradicate malaria.

"Now, malaria is, of course, transmitted by mosquitoes, and I brought some here just so you could experience this," he said, removing the lid from a jar of the insects. "We'll let those roam around the auditorium a little bit. There. There's no reason only poor people should have the experience."

As the mosquitoes took flight, the audience first laughed and then applauded. "Those mosquitoes are not infected," he assured them. Gates then described tactics for reducing the spread of the disease, including bed nets and indoor spraying.

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-2-10 09:12:12 | 显示全部楼层

沃伦?巴菲特的新年祝词

<DIV class=articleContent id=articleBody>

Warren Buffet's New Year message

沃伦?巴菲特的新年祝词

We begin this New Year with dampened enthusiasm and dented optimism.

我们在信心不足和不够乐观中,迎来了新的一年。

Our happiness is diluted and our peace is threatened by the financial illness that has infected our families, organizations and nations. Everyone is desperate to find a remedy that will cure their financial illness and help them recover their financial health.

我们的快乐被冲淡了,我们的安宁也被金融危机破坏了,这次风暴也影响了我们的家庭,组织和国家。每个人都急于找到补救办法,使其金融方面的疾病能够得到治愈,并回复良好健康的发展。

They expect the financial experts to provide them with remedies, forgetting the fact that it is these experts who created this financial mess.

他们期待的金融专家为他们提供补救措施,忘了一个事实,即正是这些专家是创造了这次金融危机。

Every new year, I adopt a couple of old maxims as my beacons to guide my future. This self-prescribed therapy has ensured that with each passing year, I grow wiser and not older. This year, I invite you to tap into the financial wisdom of our elders along with me, and become financially wiser.

每个新年,我都使用几个老格言作为我的座右铭,以指导自己的未来。这种自我激励的方法确保在过去的每一年中,我变得更聪明而不是变老。今年,我邀请您和我一起,来欣赏一些我们前辈有关金融方面的智慧,以使我们这方面也变的更聪明一点。

Hard work:All hard work brings profit; but mere talk leads only to poverty.

努力工作:诸般勤劳,都有益处。嘴上多言,乃致穷乏。(天道酬勤)

Laziness: Sleeping lobster is carried away by the water current.

懒惰:沉睡的龙虾被流水冲走。

Earnings:Never depend on a single source of income.

收益:不能依靠单一的收入来源。

Spending:If you buy things you don't need, you'll soon sell things you need.

消费:如果你买不需要的东西,你就会很快卖掉你所需要的东西。

Savings:Don't save what is left after spending; spend what is left after saving.

储蓄:不要花完了再去存剩下的,而是要存完了才去花剩下的。

Borrowings: The borrower becomes the lender's slave.

借款:借钱的人会成为借给你钱的人的奴隶

Accounting:It's no use carrying an umbrella, if your shoes are leaking.

清算帐目:如果你的鞋子漏水,带伞是没有用的。

Auditing:Beware of little expenses; a small leak can sink a large ship.

审计:谨防小的开支,一个小的漏洞可以使一艘大的轮船沉没。

Risk-taking:Never test the depth of the river with both feet.

冒险:切勿同时用双脚测试河的深度。

Investment:Don't put all your eggs in one basket.

投资:不要把所有的鸡蛋放在一个篮子里。

I'm certain that those who have already been practicing these principles remain financially healthy. I'm equally confident that those who resolve to start practicing these principles will quickly regain their financial health.

我确信,那些能按照这些原则去做的人财政会是健康的。我同样相信,决心开始做到这些原则的人将很快恢复其财务健康状况。

Let us become wiser and lead a happy, healthy, prosperous and peaceful life.

让我们变得聪明和过上一个幸福,健康,繁荣与和平的生活。

Warren Buffet

沃伦?巴菲特

Opportunities are never lost. The other fellow takes that you miss.

机会从不会失去的,别人会把你错过的拿走。

</DIV>
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-3-3 11:11:14 | 显示全部楼层
炒股有点象下围棋??炒股是一买一卖,围棋就是轮流走黑白子,表面上看似乎都很简单!围棋低手也能看到世界冠军的某步棋是走在哪个位置,有时侯甚至也会觉得某步棋走得“不够好”,却不知人家这步棋背后的大局观、策略、精深的算路和复杂的变化。如今我们也在看巴菲特下围棋,指指点点,还觉得巴菲特下得没有我们好,这实在是拿业余棋手的水准,来评论世界冠军的棋!。。。所以,还是以多看、多学、少评为好啊!
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-2-23 10:05:38 | 显示全部楼层

最聪明富翁挑战股神巴菲特 年收益38.5%
2009年02月19日 来源:中国经济时报


图为詹姆斯-西蒙斯。(资料图)

  提起巴菲特,人们立刻会肃然起敬,并津津乐道于他的价值投资宝典和荣耀的“股神”光环。而提起詹姆斯?西蒙斯,如果不事先透露他的基金经理身份,人们也许会误认为这只是一名美国NBA球员的名字。

  但正是这个詹姆斯?西蒙斯,所领导的大奖章基金,在1989年到2006年的17年间,平均年收益率达到了惊人的38.5%。而股神巴菲特过去20年的平均年回报率也不过才20%。詹姆斯?西蒙斯也因此被誉为“最赚钱的基金经理”、“最聪明的亿万富翁”。

  “壁虎式”定量投资

  与美国众多基金公司迥然不同。西蒙斯的公司里少有商学院高材生、华尔街投资分析老手,而是充斥着大量数学、统计学和自然科学博士。就连西蒙斯本人,在投身华尔街之前,也是一名享誉学术界的数学家。

  西蒙斯将他的数学理论背景巧妙运用于股票投资实战中。他创立的文艺复兴科技公司用超过15年的时间研发计算机模型,大量筛选数十亿计单个数据资料,从中挑选出中意的证券买进、卖出。人们将西蒙斯的这种投资方式称为“定量投资”。

  定量投资通过高效、准确、快速处理海量历史数据分析,进而由电脑来挑选符合标准的股票,是一种对定性投资的理性运用。通过计算机实现交易,也可以有效排除人为因素的干扰。

  “这种定量投资的捕捉对象,是证券市场中出现的一些非有效机会。”上海财经大学金融学院公司金融系主任李曜向本报记者分析,金融市场的价格理论上是应该反映基本面信息的,但有时市场会出现无效性,定价并未充分反映企业基本面,这时会出现套利机会,对冲基金通过构建一些参数模型,就可以发现市场上价格和价值偏离的情况,通过低买高卖操作,抓住这些短期获利机会就能获得回报。关键是通过数学模型分析找到价格和净值偏差达到百分之几才能获得收益。

  “与巴菲特价值投资长期持有的理念不同,西蒙斯这种投资方式更多集中于短线套利、频繁交易。就像壁虎,平时趴在墙上一动不动,一旦蚊子(机会)出现,迅速将其吃掉,然后重新回复平静,等待下一次机会的来临。”李曜说。

  定量投资让西蒙斯净赚15亿美元,成为全球收入最高的对冲基金经理,15亿的数字差不多是索罗斯的两倍。他所掌管的大奖章基金从成立开始,年均回报率高达38.5%,十几年来资产从未减少过。

  “不过,对冲基金这种基于历史和模拟数据得出统计规律的定量投资,存在很难克服的缺陷。”中央财经大学金融学院副教授王汀汀接受本报记者采访时认为,对历史数据分析虽然能挖掘出规律,但却无法预见偶然,象征偶然的“黑天鹅”一旦突然出现,将会大大增加整个系统的风险系数。缺乏灵活性、流动性的定量投资策略就会遭受巨大损失。

  1998年俄罗斯债券危机、2001年高科技股泡沫危机以及2007年的次贷危机,金融市场上的“黑天鹅”使许多曾经闻名遐迩的对冲基金经理都走向衰落。

  但令人惊讶的是,西蒙斯带领的大奖章基金却在几次金融危机中都表现得异常坚挺。从1988成立到1999年12月?大奖章基金总共获得2478.6%的净回报率,是同时期中的第一名,超过第二名索罗斯的量子基金一倍,而同期的标准普尔指数仅仅只有9.6%。即使在次贷危机全面爆发的2007年,该基金的回报率仍高达85%。

  “频繁交易的短线操作思想或许是西蒙斯躲过冲击的法宝。”李曜说,以俄罗斯债券危机为例,当时长期资本管理公司赌的是欧元区国家债券市场间利差会缩小,这虽然是正确逻辑,但俄罗斯突发卢布危机,停止偿还卢布债券,导致意大利、希腊等南欧国家债券收益急剧上升,与德、法等国债券利率扩大化,最终导致该基金公司濒于破产。“与买入并持有的投资理念不同,西蒙斯的投资策略并非是持有头寸过夜,而是在短线迅速结清头寸,获取无风险的收益机会。”

  “不利用或者极少利用杠杆也是西蒙斯避险的妙招。”王汀汀分析,财务杠杆放大投资规模造成的流动性问题,是导致长期资本管理公司倒闭的罪魁祸首,西蒙斯不利用杠杆,有多少资金作多少资金的交易,很多投资的风险就在可以承受的范围之内了。

  “正如西蒙斯自己所说,他只寻找那些可以复制的微小的获利瞬间。绝不以‘市场终将恢复正常’作为赌注投入资金。”王汀汀说。

  难憾巴菲特“股神”地位

  巴菲特与西蒙斯,一个基于基本面分析的价值投资,一个基于模型分析的定量投资,大相径庭的投资风格,但同样造就了非凡的业绩。

  “巴菲特的价值投资,依赖于对个股或公司基本面的全面分析,预测其将来的长期走势,并通过长期持有获利。而西蒙斯则更注重各金融产品价格之间的短期失衡,通过发现套利机会获利,对个股的基本面并不关心。但这两者并不矛盾。因为西蒙斯也承认,市场长期来看是有效的,但是在短期或局部可能会出现某种无效性。西蒙斯关注的是这种短期无效性,而巴菲特关注的是长期有效性。”上海财经大学金融学院副教授马文杰对本报记者说。

  在投资大众心里,巴菲特是名副其实的股神。他以连续32年保持战胜市场的纪录,证明了重视股票基本面研究与价值投资的意义。他的价值投资,他的“别人贪婪我恐惧,别人恐惧我贪婪”的投资格言,成为许多投资者心中的“圣经”。

  但西蒙斯在业绩上的表现远远超越了巴菲特,这是否会降低巴菲特在股民心中至高无上的股神地位,西蒙斯会成为人们心中的新股神吗?

  “巴菲特被投资者奉为股神并不仅仅是他创造出的财富增长神话,更重要的是他的投资理念普通投资者可以模仿借鉴。”中央财经大学金融学院教授李建军对本报记者说,“而西蒙斯的这种技术分析投资模式,以复杂的数学、统计学为基础,通过组合投资寻找市场的套利空间,一般投资者很难理解掌握。西蒙斯或许在华尔街内被万人敬仰,但不太可能成为大众偶像。”

  “华尔街有句名言:你必须非主流才能入流。西蒙斯的成功也印证了这一点。但如果多数投资者都很好地模仿西蒙斯的投资方法,这种方法还会有效果吗,西蒙斯还会是今天的西蒙斯吗?”马文杰说。(实习生代松阳)


PS:

论坛上已有一专贴进行讨论:http://www.xxtz.com.cn/cgi-bin/xxbbs/bbsxp/ShowPost.asp?id=6528

[此帖子已被 atcoolman 在 2009-2-23 11:06:38 编辑过]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-20 23:13:13 | 显示全部楼层

过去一周巴老相关新闻:

讲述家具商选择出售企业给巴菲特的新书;

年会前夕的新书签名会;

《财富》杂志关于BYD电动车的文章;

高盛优先股利息支付次于TARP(美国政府问题资产纾困计划);

巴郡下属保险公司信用评级得以保持;

经济信任投票。


Published Sunday April 19, 2009
Warren Watch: Book tells of firm's choice to sell to Buffett
BY STEVE JORDON
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITER

Warren Buffett's words were reassuring to Bill Child, who with his brother Sheldon had built their father-in-law's appliance store in Syracuse, Utah, over 40 years into the state's dominant furniture and appliance retailer.

But Buffett wanted a bargain price, according to a new book about R.C. Willey Co.


Bill Child and his brother Sheldon sold their Utah furniture business to Buffett for $175 million in stock. That stock is currently worth $730 million.

"I could promise you a transaction that would be 100 percent certain to close and that would absolutely minimize any distraction to your management and employees," Buffett wrote in a letter in 1995.

That's what the Child brothers wanted to hear. They were nearing retirement age and wanted to keep the business running as it was, while passing along its value to their children.

In his foreward to "How to Build a Business Warren Buffett Would Buy," Buffett said Bill Child had followed "the oldest and soundest principle ever set forth: Treat the other fellow as you would like to be treated yourself."

Child turned down a $200 million offer from an investment banker, which likely would have meant merging the company into a larger retail chain and remaking its entire operating system and leadership.

"Bill couldn't accept the idea of turning over control of their family-run operation to bankers or competitors," wrote Jeff Benedict, the book's author. The 168-page book ($19.95, Shadow Mountain) will be available for purchase at Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s annual shareholders meeting May 2 at Qwest Center Omaha.

The purchase began when Child talked with Irv Blumkin, a longtime friend from the furniture industry and CEO of Nebraska Furniture Mart. Blumkin's family had resolved a similar succession problem in 1983 when Buffett bought the Omaha retailer for $60 million.

"Bill asked how things had turned out," the book says. "Blumkin said the family could not be happier. . . . It was difficult, Blumkin insisted, to imagine a better business partner. Best of all, the family hadn't had to surrender the family business."

Soon after, Buffett called Child and, after an exchange of financial information, offered $170 million.

Child convinced Buffett to visit the business in person, a stop on the way to play golf with Bill Gates in Palm Springs, Calif., and Buffett liked what he saw. But Child and other family members hesitated, trying to figure out a way to save taxes on the sale.

Eventually Buffett offered $5 million more to help offset the tax question, and agreed that the purchase would be for Berkshire Hathaway stock at $22,000 a share.

The price actually ended up $100,000 more because Berkshire mistakenly issued four additional shares. Child pointed out the error, but Buffett said to just keep the extra shares.

Buffett has said since then that he wants to make acquisitions with cash rather than issuing new shares of stock. At today's prices, the shares given to the Child family would be worth $730 million, down from a peak of $1.1 billion last fall.

Book signing

A dozen Buffett-related authors will autograph books at the Dairy Queen at 114th Street and West Dodge Road from 8:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. May 1, the eve of Berkshire's shareholder meeting, in an annual gathering organized by author Robert Miles.

You won't find biographer Alice Schroeder, but R.C. Willey CEO Bill Child is among those expected.

Miles also organizes an annual value investing seminar in Los Angeles, scheduled May 4-6 this year, to coincide with the shareholder meeting of Wesco Financial, headed by Berkshire Vice Chairman Charlie Munger.

Miles limits conference attendance to 100 people and charges $1,195, which includes lunch but not housing.

Electric car

Fortune magazine examines Buffett's interest in China's electric car company, BYD, especially its supposedly superior battery technology.

Munger, usually skeptical about investment ideas, suggested the deal, describing BYD CEO Wang Chuan-Fu as "a combination of Thomas Edison and Jack Welch," former head of General Electric.

Omahan David Sokol, chairman of Berkshire's MidAmerican Energy Holdings division and now a BYD board member, went to China for a closer look at BYD. The visit led to Buffett's plan to invest $230 million in the company, a 10 percent stake.

The deal is awaiting approval from Chinese authorities.

Buffett, Munger and Sokol think BYD may become the world's largest automaker.

Although the company has said its initials stand for "build your dreams," Fortune reports that they actually are the initials of the company's Chinese name.

Wang, a chemist and government researcher, started the company with money from relatives and began making rechargeable batteries. He went into the car business in 2003, buying a state-owned car company that was nearly defunct.

Wang stopped in Omaha to meet Buffett after the Detroit auto show earlier this year, and the two talked through a translator, Fortune said.

"Wary as always of a technology play, Buffett asked how BYD would sustain its lead," the article said. "'We'll never, never rest,' Wang replied."

BYD, which reported $4 billion in revenue last year, plans to bring an electric model to the Berkshire shareholders meeting and begin selling the cars in the United States as soon as possible.

The battery uses lithium ion ferrous phosphate technology, Fortune said, "but no one can be sure whether it will work as promised."

Better than TARP

Rochdale Securities analyst Richard Bove had called for Goldman Sachs to repay Berkshire for the cash it invested last September, but the rules require paying back federal bailout money first, TheStreet.com reported.

Berkshire's $5 billion in preferred stock pays a 10 percent annual dividend, so it is more expensive to Goldman than the $10 billion from the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which pays the government 5 percent.

Berkshire's investment, which helped reassure the financial community of Goldman's viability at a crucial time, also has the right to buy $5 billion of Goldman's common stock at $115 a share. That's less than the current price of Goldman stock, which has more than doubled from its low point in November.

Goldman, which reported unexpectedly good profits recently, may issue new shares of stock to repay the bailout funds.

Ratings affirmed

A.M. Best Co. reaffirmed its A+ financial strength rating and aa- credit issuer rating of Central States Indemnity Co. of Omaha, a division of Berkshire.

The property and casualty insurer has superior capital, favorable liquidity and low underwriting leverage, Best's report said. In other words, it's efficient and healthy.

Yet the company's credit insurance business is shrinking and the value of its stock holdings is down, causing a "modest decline" in the surplus held for policyholder claims, the report said.

Economic trust

Results from a recent Politico/Public Strategies poll indicate President Barack Obama is "as credible on the economy as investor Warren Buffett," Bloomberg News reported.

Of those responding to the survey, 71 percent said they trusted Obama as a source of information about the economy, 70 percent trusted Buffett, 60 percent trusted Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and 56 percent trusted U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.

The most trusted? Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates, at 80 percent.

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-4-20 22:24:21 | 显示全部楼层
引用
原文由 tonechen 发表于 2009-4-20 21:11:46 :

《财富》4月27日封面文章:巴菲特为什么投资比亚迪(2009-04-17 13:48:49)

……


呵呵,本来正准备贴上此文,却发现tonechen已代劳(在此谢过),倒也省心。

另外,提供原文网址:http://money.cnn.com/2009/04/13/technology/gunther_electric.fortune/index.htm?postversion=2009041309,上面有一些图表和照片值得阅读间参考。

[此帖子已被 atcoolman 在 2009-4-20 22:27:39 编辑过]
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

发表于 2009-4-20 21:11:46 | 显示全部楼层

《财富》4月27日封面文章:巴菲特为什么投资比亚迪(2009-04-17 13:48:49)

(Fortune Magazine) -- Warren Buffett is famous for his rules of investing: When a management with a reputation for brilliance tackles a business with a reputation for bad economics, it is usually the reputation of the business that remains intact. You should invest in a business that even a fool can run, because someday a fool will. And perhaps most famously, Never invest in a business you cannot understand.
So when Buffett's friend and longtime partner in Berkshire Hathaway (BRKB), Charlie Munger, suggested early last year that they invest in BYD, an obscure Chinese battery, mobile phone, and electric car company, one might have predicted Buffett would cite rule No. 3 above. He is, after all, a man who shunned the booming U.S. tech industry during the 1990s.
But Buffett, who is 78, was intrigued by Munger's description of the entrepreneur behind BYD, a man named Wang Chuan-Fu, whom he had met through a mutual friend. "This guy," Munger tells Fortune, "is a combination of Thomas Edison and Jack Welch - something like Edison in solving technical problems, and something like Welch in getting done what he needs to do. I have never seen anything like it."
0:00 /3:23Buffett eyes electric cars
Coming from Munger, that meant a lot. Munger, the 85-year-old vice chairman of Berkshire Hathaway, is a curmudgeon who frowns on most investment ideas. "When I call Charlie with an idea," Buffett tells me, "and he says, 'That is really a dumb idea,' that means we should put 100% of our net worth into it. If he says, 'That is the dumbest thing I've ever heard,' then you should put 50% of your net worth into it. Only if he says, 'I'm going to have you committed,' does it mean he really doesn't like the idea."
This time Buffett asked another trusted partner, David Sokol, chairman of a Berkshire-owned utility company called MidAmerican Energy, to travel to China and take a closer look at BYD.
Last fall Berkshire Hathaway bought 10% of BYD for $230 million. The deal, which is awaiting final approval from the Chinese government, didn't get much notice at the time. It was announced in late September, as the global financial markets teetered on the abyss. But Buffett and Munger and Sokol think it is a very big deal indeed. They think BYD has a shot at becoming the world's largest automaker, primarily by selling electric cars, as well as a leader in the fast-growing solar power industry.
Wang Chuan-Fu started BYD (the letters are the initials of the company's Chinese name) in 1995 in Shenzhen, China. A chemist and government researcher, Wang raised some $300,000 from relatives, rented about 2,000 square meters of space, and set out to manufacture rechargeable batteries to compete with imports from Sony and Sanyo. By about 2000, BYD had become one of the world's largest manufacturers of cellphone batteries. The company went on to design and manufacture mobile-phone handsets and parts for Motorola (MOT, Fortune 500), Nokia (NOK), Sony Ericsson, and Samsung.
Wang entered the automobile business in 2003 by buying a Chinese state-owned car company that was all but defunct. He knew very little about making cars but proved to be a quick study. In October a BYD sedan called the F3 became the bestselling sedan in China, topping well-known brands like the Volkswagen Jetta and Toyota (TM) Corolla.
BYD has also begun selling a plug-in electric car with a backup gasoline engine, a move putting it ahead of GM, Nissan, and Toyota. BYD's plug-in, called the F3DM (for "dual mode"), goes farther on a single charge - 62 miles - than other electric vehicles and sells for about $22,000, less than the plug-in Prius and much-hyped Chevy Volt are expected to cost when they hit the market in late 2010. Put simply, this little-known upstart has accelerated ahead of its much bigger rivals in the race to build an affordable electric car. Today BYD employs 130,000 people in 11 factories, eight in China and one each in India, Hungary, and Romania.
Its U.S. operations are small - about 20 people work in a sales and marketing outpost in Elk Grove Village, Ill., near Motorola, and another 20 or so work in San Francisco, not far from Apple. BYD makes about 80% of Motorola's RAZR handsets, as well as batteries for iPods and iPhones and low-cost computers, including the model distributed by Nicholas Negroponte's One Laptop per Child nonprofit based in Cambridge, Mass. Revenues, which have grown by about 45% annually during the past five years, reached $4 billion in 2008.
In acquiring a stake in BYD, Buffett broke a couple of his own rules. "I don't know a thing about cellphones or batteries," he admits. "And I don't know how cars work." But, he adds, "Charlie Munger and Dave Sokol are smart guys, and they do understand it. And there's no question that what's been accomplished since 1995 at BYD is extraordinary."
One more thing reassured him. Berkshire Hathaway first tried to buy 25% of BYD, but Wang turned down the offer. He wanted to be in business with Buffett - to enhance his brand and open doors in the U.S., he says - but he would not let go of more than 10% of BYD's stock. "This was a man who didn't want to sell his company," Buffett says. "That was a good sign."
***
We're lost in Shenzhen. I've flown 8,000 miles to meet Wang, and on the way to the interview, my driver pulls to the side of a dusty highway. He's yelling in Cantonese into his phone and frenetically sketching Chinese characters on the touchscreen of a GPS navigator. The PR woman beside me looks worried. "The GPS isn't working," she says. "Too many new roads."
I can't blame the driver or the GPS - which, it occurs to me, was probably made nearby, since Shenzhen is the manufacturing hub of the global electronics industry, the place your cellphone, digital camera, and laptop probably came from. Just across a river from Hong Kong, Shenzhen is the biggest and fastest-growing city in the world that most Americans cannot find on a map. It's also the Chinese city most like America, because people who live here have come from elsewhere in search of a better life.
When Deng Xiaoping designated Shenzhen as China's first "special economic zone" in 1980, inviting capitalism to take root, it was a fishing village; today, it's a sprawling megacity of 12 million to 14 million people, most of them migrant workers who toil in vast factories like those run by BYD and earn about 1,300 renminbi, or $190, per month.
When we find BYD's new headquarters - a silvery office building that would not look out of place in Silicon Valley - I'm given a tour of the company "museum," which celebrates products and milestones from the firm's brief history, and then escorted into a conference room where plates of apples, bananas, and cherry tomatoes are spread on a table. Wang takes a seat across from me - he is 43, a smallish man, with black hair and glasses - and begins, through an interpreter, to tell me his story.
He started BYD with a modest goal: to edge in on the Japanese-dominated battery business. "Importing batteries from Japan was very expensive," Wang says. "There were import duties, and delivery times were long." He studied Sony and Sanyo patents and took apart batteries to understand how they were made, a "process that involved much trial and error," he says. (Sony and Sanyo later sued BYD, unsuccessfully, for infringing on their patents.)
BYD's breakthrough came when Wang decided to substitute migrant workers for machines. In place of the robotic arms used on Japanese assembly lines, which cost $100,000 or more apiece, BYD actually cut costs by hiring hundreds, then thousands, of people.
"When I first visited the BYD factory, I was shocked," says Daniel Kim, a Merrill Lynch technology analyst based in Hong Kong, who has been to the fully automated production lines in Japan and Korea. "It's a completely different business model." To control quality, BYD broke every job down into basic tasks and applied strict testing protocols. By 2002, BYD had become one of the top four manufacturers worldwide - and the largest Chinese manufacturer - in each of the three rechargeable battery technologies (Li-Ion, NiCad, and NiMH), according to a Harvard Business School case study of the company. And Wang stresses that BYD, unlike Sony and Sanyo, has never faced a recall of its batteries.
Deploying the armies of laborers at BYD is an officer corps of managers and engineers who invent and design the products. Today the company employs about 10,000 engineers who have graduated from the company's training programs - some 40% of those who enter either drop out or are dismissed - and another 7,000 new college graduates are being trained. Wang says the engineers come from China's best schools. "They are the top of the top," he says. "They are very hard-working, and they can compete with anyone." BYD can afford to hire lots of them because their salaries are only about $600 to $700 a month; they also get subsidized housing in company-owned apartment complexes and low-cost meals in BYD canteens. "They're basically breathing, eating, thinking, and working at the company 24/7," says a U.S. executive who has studied BYD.
Wang typically works until 11 p.m. or midnight, five or six days a week. "In China, people of my generation put work first and life second," says the CEO, whose wife takes responsibility for raising their two children.
This "human resource advantage" is "the most important part" of BYD's strategy, Wang says. His engineers investigate a wide array of technologies, from automobile air-conditioning systems that can run on batteries to the design of solar-powered streetlights. Unlike most automakers, BYD manufactures nearly all its cars by itself - not just the engines and body but air conditioning, lamps, seatbelts, airbags, and electronics. "It is difficult for others to compete," Wang says. "If we put our staff in Japan or the U.S., we could not afford to do anything like this."
Wang himself grew up in extreme poverty. His parents, both farmers, died before he entered high school, and he was raised by an older brother and sister. The train ride from the village where he grew up to Central South Industrial University of Technology, where he earned his chemistry degree, took him by Yellow Mountain, a popular destination for hikers and tourists, but he has never visited there. "I didn't go then because we had no money," he says. "I don't go now because we have no time."
As for accumulating wealth? "I'm not interested in it," he claims. He certainly doesn't live a very lavish lifestyle. He was paid about $265,000 in 2008, and he lives in a BYD-owned apartment complex with other engineers. His only indulgences are a Mercedes and a Lexus, and they have a practical purpose: He takes their engines apart to see how they work. On a trip to the U.S., he once tried to disassemble the seat of a Toyota owned by Fred Ni, an executive who was driving him around. Shortly after BYD went public, Wang did something extraordinary: He took approximately 15% of his holdings in BYD and distributed the shares to about 20 other executives and engineers at the company. He still owns roughly 28% of the shares, worth about $1 billion.
The company itself is frugal. Until recently, executives always flew coach. One told me he was appalled when he learned that Ford, which lost billions last year, had staged a gala at the Hotel George V during the Paris auto show. By contrast, the last time BYD executives traveled to the Detroit auto show they rented a suburban house to save the cost of hotel rooms.
This attention to costs is one reason that BYD has made money consistently even as it has expanded into new businesses. Each of BYD's business units - batteries, mobile-phone components, and autos - was profitable in 2008, albeit on a small scale. Overall, net profits were around $187 million. BYD, which is traded on the Hong Kong exchange, has a market value of about $3.8 billion. That's less than Ford (F, Fortune 500) ($7 billion at the beginning of April), but more than General Motors (GM, Fortune 500) ($1.3 billion).
Near the end of our conversation, I ask Wang about the company name. It's been reported that BYD stands for "Build your dreams," but he says he added that as the company motto only later. Others say that as Motorola, Apple, and Berkshire Hathaway have made their way to Shenzhen, the name has taken on yet another meaning: Bring your dollars.
***
When David Sokol toured BYD's operations last summer, Wang took him to a battery factory and explained that BYD wants to make its batteries 100% recyclable. To that end, the company has developed a nontoxic electrolyte fluid. To underscore the point, Wang poured battery fluid into a glass and drank it. "Doesn't taste good," he said, making a face and offering a sip to Sokol.
Sokol declined politely. But he got the message. "His focus there was that if we're going to help solve environmental problems, we can't create new environmental problems with our technology," Sokol says.
Sokol, author of a slim volume on management principles called Pleased but Not Satisfied, sized up Wang during that visit and decided he was an unusually purposeful executive. Sokol says, "Many good entrepreneurs can go from zero to a couple of million in revenues and a couple of hundred people. He's got over 100,000 people. Few can do that." When he got back to the U.S., Sokol told Buffett, "This guy's amazing. You want to meet him."
Even before visiting BYD, Sokol believed in electric cars. His people at MidAmerican have studied clean technologies like batteries and wind power for years because of the threat of climate change. One way or another, Sokol says, energy companies will need to produce more energy while emitting less carbon dioxide.
Electric cars will be one answer. They generate fewer greenhouse gas emissions than cars that burn gasoline, and they have lower fuel costs, even when oil is cheap. That's because electric engines are more efficient than internal-combustion engines, and because generating energy on a large scale (in coal or nuclear plants) is less wasteful than doing it on a small scale (by burning gasoline in an internal-combustion engine).
The numbers look something like this: Assume you drive 12,000 miles a year, gas costs $2 a gallon, and electricity is priced at 12¢ per kilowatt, about what most Americans pay. A gasoline-powered car that gets 20 miles to the gallon - say, a Chevy Impala or a BMW X3 - will have annual fuel costs of $1,200 and generate about 6.6 tons of carbon dioxide. Equip those cars with electric motors, and fuel costs drop to $400 a year and emissions are reduced to about 1.5 tons.
The big problem is that they are expensive to make, and the single largest cost is the battery. Manufacturing a safe, reliable, long-lasting, and fast-charging battery for a car is a complex and costly undertaking. BYD claims to have achieved a breakthrough with its lithium ion ferrous phosphate technology, but no one can be sure whether it will work as promised.
Skeptics say that BYD's battery cannot be both more powerful and cheaper than those made by competitors, and the U.S. Department of Energy has purchased an F3DM to take the battery apart. Chitra Gopal, an analyst with Nomura Securities in Singapore who follows the company closely, says BYD is betting on "entirely new technology, and the ability to produce it at scale and at a low cost remains unproven." William Moore, publisher and editor-in-chief of EV World, an electric car website, says, "They need to persuade people that they are selling a reliable, durable, quality automobile."
Even BYD's admirers say the fit and finish of the company's cars leave much to be desired. "Their cars are way behind Toyota, for sure," Sokol admits. BYD currently exports gasoline-powered cars to Africa, South America, and the Middle East, but they compete on price, not quality.
BYD's first plug-in hybrid, called a dual-mode car, is designed to run primarily on electricity, with an internal- combustion engine for backup. Two all-electric cars - the E3 and the E6 - will follow later this year. Both will be sold first in China, primarily to fleet users: the government, post office, utilities, and taxi companies, all of which will build central fast-charging facilities. Europe, with its high gas prices, is the most promising export market for BYD's electric cars. Wang signed an agreement last year with Autobinck, a Dutch dealer group, to distribute its cars in the Netherlands and five Eastern European countries.
The company hasn't yet decided whether it will enter the U.S. market, where the economics of electric cars are not as compelling. Sokol, who now sits on BYD's board, says BYD could instead become a battery supplier to global automakers. Some Americans, though, are eager to do business with BYD. The day after Fortune's visit to BYD, Oregon Gov. Ted Kulongoski arrived to test-drive an electric car and urge the company to import through the port of Portland. Meanwhile, BYD researchers are on to their next big idea, a product they call a Home Clean Power Solution. It's essentially a set of rooftop solar photovoltaic panels with batteries built in to store power for use when the sun's not out, all to be designed and manufactured by BYD. "Solar is an endless source of energy," Wang says. "With better technology, we can reduce the costs."
Wang is also focused on building a stronger executive team to drive the company forward. "The good news is, he's 42 years old," Sokol says. "The bad news is that he's clearly the brains behind the organization, and the drive. He has to develop a team faster, but I think he knows that." Last winter it was Sokol's turn to lead Wang on a tour of his home country. They started in Detroit, where BYD's cars generated buzz at the North American Auto Show, and wound up on the West Coast, where Wang met for the first time with Charlie Munger. In between, they stopped in Omaha.
"How did BYD get so far ahead?" Warren Buffett asked Wang, speaking through a translator. "Our company is built on technological know-how," Wang answered. Wary as always of a technology play, Buffett asked how BYD would sustain its lead. "We'll never, never rest," Wang replied.
Buffett may not understand batteries or cars, or Mandarin for that matter. Drive, however, is something that needs no translation.
First Published: April 13, 2009: 5:54 AM ET

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 2009-3-1 05:10:47 | 显示全部楼层

Berkshire Hathaway的08年报和巴老致股东信这个周末已经在其公司网站登出,有兴趣者,可点击相应链接进行下载阅读。

如嫌信件过长(22页),CNBC倒是做了一个摘选,把其认为重要的观点挑出来,值得一读(当然,本人还是建议读读原文比较好):


Feb.28 8:06 AM ET
Warren Buffett Tells Shareholders He Did "Some Dumb Things" In 2008
Posted By: Alex Crippen

In his annual letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Warren Buffett says he did some "dumb things in investments" last year.

The company's controversial "equity put" options are not included on that list. There has been some criticism of Buffett as the declining mark-to-market value of those contracts puts pressure on reported earnings. Fourth quarter net fell 96 percent to $117 million, largely due to 'paper' losses on those derivative positions. For the year, net fell to $4.99 billion from $13.21 billion the year before.

Buffett also predicts the economy will "be in shambles throughout 2009 - and for that matter, probably well beyond - but that conclusion does not tell us whether the stock market will rise or fall."

He's still optimistic for the long-term, however, again pointing out that "our country has faced far worse travails in the past" but always "we've overcome them." He says confidently, "America's best days lie ahead."

The letter was posted this morning (Saturday) on the company's website along with Berkshire's 2008 annual report.

BUFFETT'S MISTAKES

Buffett admits that "I made at least one major mistake of commission and several lesser ones that also hurt... Furthermore, I made some errors of omission, sucking my thumb when new facts came in that should have caused me to re-examine my thinking and promptly take action."

The mistake of commission: buying a large amount of ConocoPhillips [COP 37.35 -1.10 (-2.86%) ] stock just as energy prices were near their peak. Buffett writes, "I in no way anticipated the dramatic fall in energy prices that occurred in the last half of the year." He still thinks oil will eventually go well above its current $40-$50 range, "but so far I have been dead wrong."

Even if energy prices do rise, "The terrible timing of my purchase has cost Berkshire several billion dollars."

Buffett also reveals that he spent $244 million for shares of two Irish banks that "appeared cheap" to him. At the end of the year, they were written down to their market price of $27 million, for a loss of 89 percent, and they've continued to drop.

"The tennis crowd would call my mistakes 'unforced errors.'"

But he says he's not bothered by the overall "significant decline" in Berkshire's portfolio. "We enjoy such price declines if we have funds available to increase our positions."

Buffett confirms that he sold some stocks he would have preferred to keep to fund Berkshire's purchases of $14.5 billion in fixed-income securities from Wrigley, Goldman Sachs [GS 91.08 -1.07 (-1.16%) ], and General Electric [GE 8.51 -0.59 (-6.48%) ]. He calls the holdings "more than satisfactory" based just on the high current yields they are delivering. Equity participation is a "bonus."

Those sales primarily involved Johnson & Johnson [JNJ 50.00 -2.44 (-4.65%) ], Procter & Gamble [PG 48.17 -0.80 (-1.63%) ], and Conoco. (See the above post "Why Warren Buffett Isn't a Hypocrite".)

"I have pledged - to you, the rating agencies and myself - to always run Berkshire with more than ample cash. We never want to count on the kindness of strangers in order to meet tomorrow's obligations. When forced to choose, I will not trade even a night's sleep for the chance of extra profits."

BERKSHIRE'S WORST YEAR

The letter also reveals a 9.6 percent decline in Berkshire's book value per-share last year, making 2008 the company's worst year since Buffett took over in 1965. Book value fell by $11.5 billion during the year.

There has been only one annual decline before this one. In 2001, book value fell 6.2 percent.

Compared to the S&P, however, Berkshire's drop is relatively small. With dividends included, the S&P's book value fell 27.4 percent, giving Berkshire its biggest "win" since 2002.

In the letter, Buffett notes that it was also the S&P's biggest decline during the past 44 years.

"By yearend, investors of all stripes were bloodied and confused, much as if they were small birds that had strayed into a badminton game."

DEFENDING THE DERIVATIVES

In a lengthy section on derivatives, Buffett calls them "dangerous" but defends Berkshire's 251 contracts. "I believe each contract we own was mispriced at inception, sometimes dramatically so."

He says the derivatives "float" (payments made to Berkshire by the contracts' buyers minus losses paid by the company) totaled $8.1 billion at the end of the year, money that can be invested.

And "only a small percentage of our contracts call for any posting of collateral when the market moves against us."

He specifically addresses the "equity put" contracts that have caused some concern among investors, revealing that Berkshire has "added modestly" to them.

The contracts, which insure against stock market declines over a period of many years, total $37.1 billion. They're written against the S&P 500, the U.K.'s FTSE 100, the Euro Stoxx 50 in Europe, and Japan's Nikkei 225.

Berkshire is only required to make any payments when the contracts expire. The first comes due in 2019 and the last in 2028. The mark-to-market, or 'paper', loss on the equity put contracts totals $5.1 billion.

Buffett emphasizes a point that he says is often misunderstood. "For us to lose the full $37.1 billion we have at risk, all stocks in all four indices would have to go to zero on their various termination dates." If the indices are down 25 percent, Berkshire would owe about $9 billion between 2019 and 2028, and would have had use of the $4.9 billion premium all along.

Buffett's conclusion: "We have told you before that our derivative contracts, subject as they are to mark-to-market accounting, will produce wild swings in the earnings we report. The ups and downs neither cheer nor bother Charlie (Munger) and me. Indeed, the 'downs' can be helpful in that they give us an opportunity to expand a position on favorable terms. I hope this explanation of our dealers will lead you to think similarly."

EXCERPT: BUFFETT ON THE BAILOUT AND ITS AFTEREFFECTS

This debilitating spiral has spurred our government to take massive action. In poker terms, the Treasury and the Fed have gone “all in.” Economic medicine that was previously meted out by the cupful has recently been dispensed by the barrel. These once-unthinkable dosages will almost certainly bring on unwelcome aftereffects. Their precise nature is anyone’s guess, though one likely consequence is an onslaught of inflation. Moreover, major industries have become dependent on Federal assistance, and they will be followed by cities and states bearing mind-boggling requests. Weaning these entities from the public teat will be a political challenge. They won’t leave willingly.

Whatever the downsides may be, strong and immediate action by government was essential last year if the financial system was to avoid a total breakdown. Had that occurred, the consequences for every area of our economy would have been cataclysmic. Like it or not, the inhabitants of Wall Street, Main Street and the various Side Streets of America were all in the same boat.


"PESSIMISM IS YOUR FRIEND"

Berkshire is always a buyer of both businesses and securities, and the disarray in markets gave us a tailwind in our purchases. When investing, pessimism is your friend, euphoria the enemy. In our insurance portfolios, we made three large investments on terms that would be unavailable in normal markets.


BERKSHIRE'S TWO "YARDSTICKS"

Berkshire has two major areas of value. The first is our investments: stocks, bonds and cash equivalents... Berkshire’s second component of value is earnings that come from sources other than investments and insurance...

In 2008, our investments fell from $90,343 per share of Berkshire (after minority interest) to $77,793, a decrease that was caused by a decline in market prices, not by net sales of stocks or bonds. Our second segment of value fell from pre-tax earnings of $4,093 per Berkshire share to $3,921 (again after minority interest).

Both of these performances are unsatisfactory. Over time, we need to make decent gains in each area if we are to increase Berkshire’s intrinsic value at an acceptable rate. Going forward, however, our focus will be on the earnings segment, just as it has been for several decades. We like buying underpriced securities, but we like buying fairly-priced operating businesses even more.

EXCERPT: BUFFETT'S LESSONS FROM THE HOUSING MESS

Home ownership is a wonderful thing. My family and I have enjoyed my present home for 50 years, with more to come. But enjoyment and utility should be the primary motives for purchase, not profit or refi possibilities. And the home purchased ought to fit the income of the purchaser.

The present housing debacle should teach home buyers, lenders, brokers and government some simple lessons that will ensure stability in the future. Home purchases should involve an honest-to-God down payment of at least 10% and monthly payments that can be comfortably handled by the borrower’s income. That income should be carefully verified.

Putting people into homes, though a desirable goal, shouldn’t be our country’s primary objective. Keeping them in their homes should be the ambition.


WHY PREMIUMS FOR TAX-EXEMPT BOND INSURANCE HAVE BEEN TOO LOW

Early in 2008, we activated Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Company (“BHAC”) as an insurer of the tax-exempt bonds issued by states, cities and other local entities...

We remain very cautious about the business we write and regard it as far from a sure thing that this insurance will ultimately be profitable for us. The reason is simple, though I have never seen even a passing reference to it by any financial analyst, rating agency or monoline CEO.

The rationale behind very low premium rates for insuring tax-exempts has been that defaults have historically been few. But that record largely reflects the experience of entities that issued uninsured bonds. Insurance of tax-exempt bonds didn’t exist before 1971, and even after that most bonds remained uninsured.

A universe of tax-exempts fully covered by insurance would be certain to have a somewhat different loss experience from a group of uninsured, but otherwise similar bonds, the only question being how different. To understand why, let’s go back to 1975 when New York City was on the edge of bankruptcy. At the time its bonds ? virtually all uninsured ? were heavily held by the city’s wealthier residents as well as by New York banks and other institutions. These local bondholders deeply desired to solve the city’s fiscal problems. So before long, concessions and cooperation from a host of involved constituencies produced a solution. Without one, it was apparent to all that New York’s citizens and businesses would have experienced widespread and severe financial losses from their bond holdings.

Now, imagine that all of the city’s bonds had instead been insured by Berkshire. Would similar belttightening, tax increases, labor concessions, etc. have been forthcoming? Of course not. At a minimum, Berkshire would have been asked to “share” in the required sacrifices. And, considering our deep pockets, the required contribution would most certainly have been substantial.

EXCERPT: THE "TREASURY BOND BUBBLE" AND WHY CASH ISN'T KING

The investment world has gone from underpricing risk to overpricing it. This change has not been minor; the pendulum has covered an extraordinary arc. A few years ago, it would have seemed unthinkable that yields like today’s could have been obtained on good-grade municipal or corporate bonds even while risk-free governments offered near-zero returns on short-term bonds and no better than a pittance on long-terms. When the financial history of this decade is written, it will surely speak of the Internet bubble of the late 1990s and the housing bubble of the early 2000s. But the U.S. Treasury bond bubble of late 2008 may be regarded as almost equally extraordinary.

Clinging to cash equivalents or long-term government bonds at present yields is almost certainly a terrible policy if continued for long. Holders of these instruments, of course, have felt increasingly comfortable ? in fact, almost smug ? in following this policy as financial turmoil has mounted. They regard their judgment confirmed when they hear commentators proclaim “cash is king,” even though that wonderful cash is earning close to nothing and will surely find its purchasing power eroded over time.

Approval, though, is not the goal of investing. In fact, approval is often counter-productive because it sedates the brain and makes it less receptive to new facts or a re-examination of conclusions formed earlier. Beware the investment activity that produces applause; the great moves are usually greeted by yawns.

EXCERPT: CHANGES TO QUESTION TIME AT THE ANNUAL MEETING

This year we will be making important changes in how we handle the meeting’s question periods. In recent years, we have received only a handful of questions directly related to Berkshire and its operations. Last year there were practically none. So we need to steer the discussion back to Berkshire’s businesses.

In a related problem, there has been a mad rush when the doors open at 7 a.m., led by people who wish to be first in line at the 12 microphones available for questioners. This is not desirable from a safety standpoint, nor do we believe that sprinting ability should be the determinant of who gets to pose questions. (At age 78, I’ve concluded that speed afoot is a ridiculously overrated talent.) Again, a new procedure is desirable.

In our first change, several financial journalists from organizations representing newspapers, magazines and television will participate in the question-and-answer period, asking Charlie and me questions that shareholders have submitted by e-mail. The journalists and their e-mail addresses are: Carol Loomis, of Fortune, who may be emailed at cloomis@fortunemail.com; Becky Quick, of CNBC, at BerkshireQuestions@cnbc.com, and Andrew Ross Sorkin, of The New York Times, at arsorkin@nytimes.com. From the questions submitted, each journalist will choose the dozen or so he or she decides are the most interesting and important. (In your e-mail, let the journalist know if you would like your name mentioned if your question is selected.)

Neither Charlie nor I will get so much as a clue about the questions to be asked. We know the journalists will pick some tough ones and that’s the way we like it.

In our second change, we will have a drawing at 8:15 at each microphone for those shareholders hoping to ask questions themselves. At the meeting, I will alternate the questions asked by the journalists with those from the winning shareholders. At least half the questions ? those selected by the panel from your submissions ? are therefore certain to be Berkshire-related. We will meanwhile continue to get some good ? and perhaps entertaining ? questions from the audience as well.

Current Berkshire stock prices:

Class A: [US;BRK.A 78600.0 250.00 (+0.32%) ]

Class B: [US;BRK.B 2564.0 --- UNCH (0) ]

© 2009 CNBC, Inc. All Rights Reserved

回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|徐星官网 ( 粤ICP备14047400号 )

粤公网安备 44030402005841号

GMT+8, 2025-1-16 19:08 , Processed in 0.023994 second(s), 12 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表